By Matt Underwood 
Trump’s late-night social media posts have once again plunged into the realm of outlandish conspiracy theories, this time centered on the assertion that President Biden was somehow incapacitated and his actions during his presidency were orchestrated by an unseen force. The claim revolves around the idea that someone “usurped” a mentally declining Biden, employing an “autopen” to secretly push through a radical-left agenda. This isn’t just a stray comment; Trump has repeated this claim, solidifying its place as a central tenet of his current narrative.
The underlying motivation behind this conspiracy theory seems to be a desire to invalidate and reverse everything enacted during the Biden administration, particularly the presidential pardons. The sheer audacity of this claim is striking. To suggest that a sitting president was a puppet, controlled by unseen hands and an automated signature device, is a breathtaking leap into the fantastical. It’s a blatant attempt to discredit the legitimacy of Biden’s presidency and provides a convenient justification for undoing his policies.
The irony is palpable. This accusation reeks of projection, a familiar tactic in Trump’s arsenal. He accuses Biden of being controlled, yet the suggestion that Trump himself is not completely in control of his own actions—or that others are running the show—is increasingly hard to ignore, particularly given his increasingly erratic behavior and outlandish statements. The autopen itself becomes a symbolic stand-in for this perceived lack of control, a symbol of a powerful system operating beyond individual agency.
The absurdity of the claim only compounds the situation. The timing of the autopen revelation, coinciding with a wave of executive orders, suggests a deliberate attempt to create a narrative of clandestine control. This isn’t merely about policy disagreements; it’s about casting doubt on the entire process of governance, raising questions about who truly holds power and undermining faith in democratic institutions.
This incident further highlights the increasingly tenuous relationship between Trump and reality. The repetition of this claim, even in the face of its obvious implausibility, shows a disregard for facts and a prioritization of maintaining a particular narrative, even if it requires embracing outlandish conspiracy theories. It speaks to a possible inability to distinguish between reality and fiction.
The wider implications are troubling. Trump’s supporters are likely to readily embrace this narrative, further entrenching their existing beliefs and deepening the political divide. His claims undermine trust in the democratic process and potentially justify further actions that are detrimental to the stability of the country.
The whole situation is incredibly frustrating. It’s a clear indication of a significant disconnect from reality, and it’s exhausting to witness. The constant cycle of outlandish claims, followed by dismissals and further outlandish claims, is a relentless drain on the public’s attention and energy.
This incident also underscores the lack of a cohesive strategy from the opposing political party, further fueling the cycle of outrage and uncertainty. The political landscape is becoming increasingly polarized, and the lack of a robust counter-narrative only allows these kinds of claims to gain traction and continue to dominate the discourse.
The future implications are daunting. Trump’s behavior continues to push the boundaries of acceptable political discourse, eroding faith in institutions and destabilizing the political climate. The question remains: how long will this behavior continue, and what will be the ultimate consequences? The only thing certain is that the narrative surrounding Trump will continue to be shaped by his increasingly erratic and unsubstantiated claims. The late-night post is only the latest in a long line of examples, and it is unlikely to be the last. This incident highlights a broader trend of the increasing normalization of conspiracy theories within mainstream politics, a trend that warrants serious consideration.