By John Q. Hosedrinker 
AtlasIntel, a top-ranked pollster, reveals President Trump’s approval rating has plummeted to 45 percent, its lowest point in his second term. This marks a significant drop from previous polls showing approval between 46 and 50 percent, with disapproval rising from 49 to 54 percent. The decline is reflected across various policy areas, including the economy and immigration, where negative assessments now outweigh positive ones. However, this contrasts with other recent polls showing a slight uptick in Trump’s approval.
Read the original article here
Trump’s approval rating, according to a poll conducted by what is supposedly the most accurate pollster, has plummeted to a new second-term low. This finding has sparked a wave of reactions, ranging from disbelief to grim resignation. Some observers question the poll’s methodology, citing the speed at which it was conducted – a mere three weeks for three polls – as suspicious. This rapid turnaround contrasts with the typical month-long timeframe for most polling efforts.
The 45% approval rating itself has been met with a range of responses. Some see it as impossibly high, given the current political climate and Trump’s actions during his presidency. Others find the number unsurprisingly consistent, pointing out that his support has hovered around that level throughout his tenure. This perceived stagnation in approval suggests a deeply entrenched base of unwavering support, which some describe as the “MAGA garbage.”
The implications of this low approval rating are widely debated. Some argue that it’s largely meaningless because Trump is no longer eligible for reelection. This perspective suggests his actions are now without consequence. However, many disagree, pointing out that a low approval rating could affect the Republican party’s standing and influence. Others believe it could impact the willingness of Republican politicians in Congress to continue supporting him.
A significant concern revolves around the perceived lack of progress on critical issues. Many feel betrayed by the lack of positive changes, particularly relating to economic stability, healthcare costs, immigration policy, and infrastructure improvements. These criticisms are often framed in terms of broken promises and the sense that the administration is not focused on the needs of average citizens. This sentiment contributes significantly to the overall dissatisfaction with the current administration.
Interestingly, there’s a debate about which polls should even be considered credible. Some individuals dismiss polls altogether, emphasizing that the only poll that truly matters is the one that determines the next election outcome. However, others use polls to gauge public sentiment and predict the potential trajectory of future elections, such as the 2026 midterms. These differing views highlight a broader distrust of polling data and the inherent challenges of interpreting them accurately.
The reliability of polling data itself is a central question. Many express skepticism towards current polling methodologies, citing biases towards certain demographics or geographic locations. The suggestion is that phone polls, for example, are skewed towards older demographics, as younger generations are less likely to answer calls from unknown numbers. These concerns further complicate the interpretation of any polling data, especially those that reveal extremely low approval ratings.
There is widespread concern about the polarization of the political landscape. Many believe that the news media caters to pre-existing biases, creating “echo chambers” where individuals are primarily exposed to information confirming their views. This division makes it extremely difficult to have meaningful conversations across the political spectrum and prevents meaningful engagement with opposing viewpoints.
Ultimately, the 45% approval rating reported by this particular pollster remains a focal point of contention. While some see it as a true reflection of public sentiment towards Trump, others remain unconvinced, citing methodological flaws and questioning the poll’s motivations. This ambiguity further fuels the existing political divisions and highlights the difficulties in objectively assessing the current state of public opinion. The lack of tangible progress on major issues further contributes to this ongoing sense of uncertainty and disillusionment.