By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump’s understanding of stealth technology has been consistently inaccurate. He previously expressed doubt about its efficacy, questioning how wing shape affects detectability. However, he later claimed the existence of completely invisible planes, showcasing a fundamental misunderstanding of radar technology. This misconception is not new, as he has previously made similar assertions about F-35 fighter jets. His statements have drawn widespread criticism and ridicule.
Read the original article here
This week in stable genius news, Donald Trump’s understanding of stealth technology, or rather, lack thereof, has once again captivated the internet. His comments suggest a belief that stealth planes are not merely difficult to detect, but actually invisible to the naked eye, a concept seemingly pulled straight from a superhero comic book.
This isn’t a nuanced misunderstanding; it’s a fundamental misapprehension of basic physics and military technology. His statement that “We have planes that are undetectable flying around. Nobody’s able to see them. Stealth,” paints a picture of aircraft that are literally unseen, not just undetectable by radar. This complete lack of comprehension highlights a startling disconnect from reality.
The idea that the planes are so invisible that “nobody” can see them is particularly jarring. Even if the planes were undetectable by radar, their physical presence would still be apparent to any observer positioned to see them. The sheer audacity of the claim, coupled with the complete absence of self-awareness, is almost breathtaking.
Interestingly, his confusion seems to extend beyond simply believing in literal invisibility. There’s a suggestion that he is grappling with the very concept of stealth, questioning how a plane’s shape could affect its detectability. This reveals not just a misunderstanding of stealth technology, but a more profound inability to grasp even elementary principles of aerodynamics and visual perception. It’s as if he’s confusing camouflage with some sort of magical invisibility cloak.
Several commentators have noted the striking similarity to the classic fable of “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” but in reverse. In this version, the emperor, convinced of his plane’s invisibility, proclaims it to be true, while everyone else secretly knows better. The absurdity is amplified by the fact that this isn’t a fictional character; it’s a former world leader making these pronouncements.
Further compounding the issue is the perceived lack of alarm surrounding such demonstrably bizarre statements. While previous administrations have faced intense scrutiny over their cognitive abilities, the same level of critical analysis hasn’t been consistently applied to similar comments from Trump. This disparity in treatment raises questions about media bias, the shifting political landscape, and the potential normalization of misinformation.
The disconnect between his understanding and reality is so vast that it is difficult to reconcile. Some suggest it’s a case of information being overly simplified during briefings, resulting in a gross misinterpretation of complex technical concepts. Others point to more concerning explanations, suggesting a detachment from reality that raises serious questions about his fitness for high office.
Attempts to explain the concept of stealth to someone who holds such a fundamental misunderstanding pose a significant challenge. Starting with the basics of radar technology, then moving to the principles of stealth design and their limitations, would likely prove a frustrating exercise. It’s doubtful such an explanation would be received or even grasped in any meaningful way, making any attempt at education seem futile.
Beyond the technical aspects, the incident highlights a broader problem – a disregard for factual accuracy and an embrace of unsubstantiated claims. This is not merely a matter of a misunderstanding of technical details; it reveals a pattern of behavior that consistently ignores evidence and substitutes it with wishful thinking. This tendency to fabricate or distort reality, regardless of the topic, is profoundly disturbing. The implications extend far beyond the specific issue of stealth technology, raising deeper concerns about decision-making in positions of power.
Ultimately, the episode serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of critical thinking, the dangers of misinformation, and the need for a robust media landscape capable of effectively challenging inaccurate statements from public figures. The continued lack of serious concern over such blatant disregard for truth underscores a systemic problem that demands attention and demands solutions.