By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine successfully launched a year-and-a-half-long, covert counteroffensive against a significant portion of its enemy’s airborne missile capabilities using a strategic blend of high- and low-tech weaponry. Simultaneously, domestic violence in the U.S., fueled by the Gaza conflict, escalated with attacks, including a suspected terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, and a shooting outside a Jewish museum in Washington D.C. These incidents highlight the disturbing spillover effects of the conflict and a concerning rise in domestic gun violence, as exemplified by shootings at a North Carolina house party and an Illinois after-prom event. The escalating violence risks further casualties and jeopardizes the cause of those protesting the situation in Gaza.
Read the original article here
Trump and Vance were dead wrong about Ukraine, profoundly and consistently wrong. Their pronouncements consistently minimized Ukraine’s capabilities and painted a picture of inevitable Russian victory, a narrative that completely disregarded the reality on the ground. Their perspective seems rooted in a wishful thinking that benefits Putin and undermines the Ukrainian people’s fight for their own sovereignty.
The recent audacious drone strike on Russian territory, a meticulously planned operation that crippled a significant portion of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet, stands as a powerful refutation of their claims. This wasn’t some lucky shot; it was a testament to Ukraine’s military prowess, strategic planning, and intelligence capabilities. It showcased a level of sophistication and coordination that completely contradicts the narrative of a weak, outmatched nation on the verge of collapse. The scale of the operation, its secrecy, and its success should be celebrated, not dismissed by those seeking to downplay Ukrainian resilience.
The fact that this significant military achievement went largely unreported or downplayed in certain circles speaks volumes. The focus on the “narrative” surrounding the attack, rather than the verifiable damage inflicted, highlights a deliberate attempt to undermine Ukraine’s successes and sow doubt about their ability to effectively resist Russian aggression. This underscores a larger pattern of misinformation that aims to discredit the Ukrainian war effort and benefit those who sympathize with the Russian cause.
Furthermore, the suggestion that Ukraine’s success somehow hinges on U.S. aid completely misses the point. While external support is crucial, the very success of the drone strike underscores that Ukraine possesses a formidable fighting force, intelligent leadership, and a clear strategic vision of its own. Their ability to plan and execute such complex operations independently demonstrates a strength and resolve that far surpasses what Trump and Vance would have us believe. The implication that Ukraine is somehow dependent on the U.S. to the point of helplessness ignores the significant contributions of European allies and the extraordinary courage and determination of the Ukrainian people.
The argument that Trump and Vance’s assessment is based on ideology, not facts, rings true. It’s less about objective analysis and more about a pre-conceived notion that favors a particular geopolitical outcome. Their consistent dismissal of Ukrainian successes and their focus on highlighting purported failures serves only to benefit Russia and undermine global efforts to support Ukraine’s defense against brutal aggression.
The comments regarding the contrasting approaches of Ukraine and Russia in their military actions are particularly telling. While Russia has consistently targeted civilian populations, Ukraine has demonstrably focused its attacks on military targets. This fundamental difference in approach should be highlighted, not minimized or ignored. This stark contrast in behavior underscores the moral bankruptcy of the Russian war effort and highlights Ukraine’s commitment to fighting a just war.
Finally, the claim that Ukraine lacks the manpower or resources to win ultimately overlooks the profound impact of sustained resistance and the potential for future strategic victories. While the war is undoubtedly protracted and challenging, writing off Ukraine’s chances based on current conditions ignores the reality that the military and political landscapes are constantly shifting. The recent successes demonstrate that Ukraine has the ability to surprise its enemy and inflict significant damage, leaving the possibility of future victories within reach. Ultimately, Trump and Vance’s pessimism about Ukraine’s prospects appear deeply misguided and based on a biased and incomplete understanding of the conflict. There is still, undeniably, plenty of fight left in Ukraine.