By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The impending cutoff of crucial satellite data for hurricane forecasting has been delayed by one month, until July 31st, following pressure from NOAA and NASA officials. This data, sourced from a Department of Defense weather satellite, provides critical information on hurricane structure and intensity, particularly during nighttime and when hurricane hunter aircraft are not in flight. The initial decision to halt data sharing sparked concern among meteorologists due to the potential impact on forecast accuracy, especially with an active hurricane season anticipated. While the delay offers temporary relief, the long-term issue remains unresolved, as there is no current plan to resume data flow.
Read the original article here
The subject matter is crystal clear: the Trump administration is on the brink of cutting off hurricane forecasters’ access to crucial satellite data, and it’s happening fast – within a month. The immediate thought that comes to mind is, why? What possible justification could there be for hindering our ability to predict and prepare for these devastating storms, especially right before hurricane season kicks into high gear? It’s hard not to see shades of the infamous “sharpie incident” here, that moment of presidential defiance that seems to have morphed into a pattern of behavior. The idea that “forecasting hurricanes is woke” sounds almost too absurd to be true, but it’s a chilling lens through which to view this decision.
This isn’t just about a quirky president and his whims; it’s potentially about control. We’re reminded that even things like GPS are services shared with the public, run by the Department of Defense. Could this be a similar situation? Are they trying to “capture the deep state weather control systems,” as some have jokingly suggested? It’s easy to imagine a scenario where loyalists are rewarded with power, where those aligned with the administration get to dictate who has access to vital information. This cuts deep into the core of how we prepare for hurricanes and potentially, the aid we’re given in the wake of them.
Privatization, a concept that’s been known throughout history, comes up again. Are we looking at a move to privatize weather forecasting, allowing companies to profit from data that was previously public and freely available? This raises serious questions about fairness, accessibility, and the potential for a two-tiered system where those with resources get better protection. The idea of an AccuWeather executive taking a leading role at NOAA is particularly concerning, given the company’s business model of profiting from exactly this type of free data.
The implications of this are truly significant. The removal of crucial forecasting data will drastically reduce the precision of our predictions. This will create a situation where we can’t be as precise in our predictions, potentially leading to the loss of life. The ability to have clear and accurate data from the government is being exchanged for the potential of private companies making money. It’s a dangerous game, especially when we consider the potential for a lack of warning during an event that is going to have a massive impact on the population.
This all raises the question: what’s the real motivation here? Is it about saving money, as some may claim? Or is it about something far more cynical – having “plausible denial” when disasters inevitably strike? By crippling FEMA and organizations like NOAA, the administration could potentially wash its hands of responsibility, claiming they simply couldn’t have predicted the severity of a hurricane.
It’s a deeply concerning trend, and many are predicting a difficult hurricane season. The timing of this decision, right before hurricane season, is especially suspect. It’s the sort of move that leaves you questioning everything. Are they trying to kill as many people as possible? Does anyone in the administration understand that the government is supposed to protect its citizens, not actively put them in harm’s way? One wonders if coastal red states will finally understand the damage that is being done.
And the kicker? A significant number of the states most vulnerable to hurricanes are red states, the very same states that consistently support the current administration. Some are already saying the lack of advanced warnings along with little to no FEMA aid is a tragedy waiting to happen. The Defense Department’s claim about cybersecurity concerns as the reason for cutting off the data is a poor one, since it can’t be used when real lives are at stake.
The situation is alarming, and the implications are far-reaching. It’s a clear reminder of the potential dangers of unchecked power and the importance of holding our leaders accountable.