By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A 21-year-old Norwegian tourist, Mads Mikkelsen, claims he was denied entry into the U.S. at Newark Liberty International Airport and accused authorities of harassment. He was reportedly questioned about potential involvement in illicit activities and placed in a holding cell. Mikkelsen alleges that officials demanded access to his phone, where they discovered a meme of Vice President J.D. Vance, which they disapproved of. Despite pleading that the meme was a joke, he was denied entry, had his blood drawn, and was put on a flight back to Norway, while the Department of Homeland Security has not commented.
Read the original article here
Tourist Claims He Was Denied Entry to U.S. Because of Vance Meme on Phone, and the whole thing feels like something out of a dystopian novel, doesn’t it? It’s not every day you hear about someone being barred from entering a country because of a meme, especially a meme making fun of a political figure. The story, as it’s being pieced together from various reactions, paints a picture of a 21-year-old Norwegian tourist who had a meme on his phone – a joke, it seems, about J.D. Vance – and that simple act resulted in a denial of entry to the United States. More than that, the accounts suggest the tourist was subjected to searches, including the taking of blood samples and fingerprinting.
The initial reaction among those discussing the event seems to be one of disbelief, quickly morphing into outrage and concern. Many express the sentiment that this situation is a clear violation of basic freedoms and a drastic overreach of authority. The common thread is the perception that the U.S. is becoming increasingly unwelcoming, especially for international visitors. There’s a palpable sense of shock that a simple meme could have such significant repercussions, and it has people questioning what the limits of acceptable expression are.
This incident seems to have struck a nerve regarding free speech, or lack thereof. Some people bring up the idea of “free speech” and note that this event seems to run directly counter to those principles, suggesting that the US is moving into some dark territory, especially when compared to regimes that are known for heavy censorship and control. Comparisons to North Korea aren’t casual; they are made with the genuine sense that this is a step in a dangerous direction.
The discussion quickly veers into a deeper concern about the future of tourism in the United States. The incident appears to serve as a deterrent, creating an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty for potential visitors. People are now seriously questioning whether a trip to the U.S. is worth the risk of potentially being subjected to intense scrutiny, searches, and even denial of entry, all because of something found on their personal devices. This event makes the United States look like a place where free speech is under attack and a place that could punish you for a joke.
For many, the experience described goes far beyond simply being denied entry. There’s a clear sense that this situation is deeply unsettling, and there is talk of the potential for humiliation, with the added violation of a physical search, which includes the forced collection of personal medical data. It is understood from the comments that the U.S. is treating this as a major security concern.
There are suggestions that this is a deliberate attempt to silence dissent or discourage any form of criticism. The idea that comedy is being “outlawed” highlights this concern.
The reactions also point to a potential economic impact. The U.S. economy relies heavily on tourism, and incidents like this can have a serious impact on people traveling here. If tourists are now hesitant to visit due to fear of being denied entry, this can have a negative effect, particularly on communities and businesses that rely on foreign visitors. There’s a lot of talk about boycotting travel to the U.S., spending money elsewhere, and supporting other countries. It could be the case that this causes serious economic harm.
The incident has also prompted suggestions that people take precautions. There is talk about using “burner” phones to avoid scrutiny or create fake social media accounts. These suggestions further reflect the general level of distrust and a feeling that the U.S. may not be safe for visitors to travel to.
Ultimately, the discussion surrounding the tourist being denied entry to the U.S. over a meme highlights a critical point. It brings into question what the priorities of a nation are. Is it about promoting freedom of expression and welcoming people who want to experience the country, or is it about cracking down on jokes, and denying entry for political opinions. This entire situation is seen as a major misstep, and one that could have lasting implications.