By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A federal vaccine panel has controversially recommended against seasonal influenza vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative used in some multi-dose vials. This decision, made after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced the panel with members aligned with his anti-vaccine stance, may impact future vaccine availability. Despite a lack of scientific evidence of harm, the panel voted to restrict thimerosal, which is more cost-effective than single-dose formulations, potentially affecting clinics that rely on them. Multiple medical organizations have criticized the move, citing the settled science on thimerosal’s safety, and expressing concern about its global implications.
Read the original article here
RFK Jr.’s new vaccine panel votes against preservative in flu shots in shock move.
This isn’t a shock. Let’s be clear. It’s as if someone decided to paint the sky blue and we’re all acting surprised. We knew this was coming, we just didn’t know when. The whole premise is designed for anti-vaxxers, they just voted to restrict thimerosal in flu shots. Apparently, the majority of flu vaccines in circulation are already preservative-free. But the key point, as a recent news article pointed out, is that only a small percentage—around 4%—of flu vaccines currently use this preservative.
The rhetoric is wild. People are talking about “destroying vaccine approvals” and starting “death panels,” but the reality is more nuanced. This panel’s decision could complicate things and create public confusion. The potential fallout, experts say, includes making vaccines harder to distribute, possibly more expensive, and less readily available for those who need them. And the people who will suffer are, as always, the most vulnerable among us. But really, if you’re paying attention, this is just another step in a pattern.
Here’s the thing: the vast majority of flu vaccines available, particularly those given to children, don’t contain thimerosal. The decision to limit its use, then, feels less about public health and more about something else entirely. It’s a symbolic gesture that could have real, negative consequences. And it’s designed to look like they’re doing something while actually… well, doing next to nothing.
The irony is thick. They’re prioritizing anti-science theatrics over medical reality. If you have a child, your pediatric flu shot is already thimerosal free. The vaccine pipeline isn’t particularly impacted. Large studies conducted across several countries have found no association between thimerosal and neurological effects. Yet the panel chose to remove a preservative that has been proven safe and that has decades of research behind it. This move will disproportionately impact people who can’t take time off of work.
Then there’s the logistics. Cutting thimerosal, which acts as a preservative, potentially means vaccines will spoil more quickly. This will require more stringent storage and handling, possibly leading to clinics needing to set treatment windows and, quite possibly, waste. It feels like the policy flip-flop is meant to sow confusion. And, what will be covered in terms of healthcare?
This move has serious implications. There’s the potential for older and more vulnerable people to hesitate in getting their flu shots. Imagine the impact. We could very well see a rise in flu cases, particularly among those who are already most at risk. And there is the potential for the administration using this as a gateway to affect the supply of other vaccines in the future.
Let’s be clear: This isn’t about science; it’s about ideology. We’re seeing a committee making decisions driven by what feels like conspiracy theories and frankly mentally unstable people. This has real consequences.
It’s hard to see it as anything other than reckless. Imagine being that Costco buyer going over the ingredients list for a snack food. The implications are vast and the lack of preparedness is a problem. The focus on this single ingredient feels like an attempt to sow fear rather than address any real issue.
What else is happening? Why aren’t we addressing the more urgent issues that are in front of us?
Let’s be clear: this move is designed to create a fire hose of consequences. They want us sick and dead. The September deadline will likely bring more controversy. The media needs to stop this charade and start recognizing the fact that this individual is an anti-vaxxer. A real skeptic seeks more data, not denial. But they’re not. This is about political theater, not public health. It’s the beginning of a long chain. You can see where they’re headed, what the consequences will be, and what’s at risk.
This wasn’t a shock. And the focus on thimerosal is a distraction. It seems that the result of this decision will put high-risk patients at increased risk of dying from the flu. They are basically trying to make a political point, by using the public’s health and safety as the weapon of choice. And that’s what it seems, with the information that is in front of us. We’ll be fine.