By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A North Korean smartphone, obtained by the BBC, reveals a sophisticated system of surveillance. The phone lacks internet access and features autocorrect that replaces terms like “South Korea” with “Puppet State” and slang with approved alternatives, triggering warnings for users. Most alarmingly, the device automatically takes and stores screenshots every five minutes, accessible only to the government. This constant monitoring highlights the regime’s efforts to control information and suppress dissent.
Read the original article here
A smuggled North Korean phone offers a stark contrast to the devices we use every day, highlighting the profound differences between the tightly controlled digital landscape of North Korea and the rest of the world. The phone itself is designed not just as a communication tool, but as a sophisticated surveillance device. Its operating system actively blocks access to unauthorized content, ensuring that users are limited to approved information and entertainment.
This inherent control extends to the phone’s very language. Terms like “Oppa,” a common Korean term of endearment, are reportedly replaced with “Comrade,” reflecting the regime’s insistence on ideological conformity. Similarly, “South Korea” is automatically changed to “Puppet state,” emphasizing the government’s propaganda and demonization of its neighbor.
The level of surveillance is truly striking. The phone, it’s claimed, takes screenshots every five minutes, storing them in a location inaccessible to the user but presumably available to the authorities. This constant monitoring creates an atmosphere of fear and distrust, limiting freedom of expression and potentially discouraging any dissent. The technical choices involved are also peculiar. Why store the screenshots on the device itself, consuming valuable storage space, instead of directly uploading them to a server? The reasons aren’t immediately clear.
Many questioned the practicality of such a system, especially the implications of offline periods. If the phone is offline or powered down, the screenshot functionality is disrupted, and there is no guarantee of the immediate transmission of captured data. This raises questions about the effectiveness of this particular surveillance strategy and suggests inconsistencies in the phone’s overall design. Despite the complexities of the system, the apparent technical capability to create this intricate, locked-down operating system points towards surprising levels of technological sophistication within the country, suggesting a potential for far more advanced surveillance techniques that aren’t yet fully understood.
The phone’s response to searches for pornography is perhaps the most revealing. Instead of simply blocking the search, the phone displays an image of Kim Jong Un in swimwear—a tactic clearly intended to shame and deter users through the use of jarring and unexpected visuals. This highlights the regime’s pervasive and deeply ingrained control, extending even into such personal aspects of life.
This highly-controlled environment stands in sharp contrast to the global digital world, where access to information, entertainment, and communication is largely unrestricted (with exceptions). The lack of social media, streaming services, and the general freedom of expression found elsewhere is incredibly significant and demonstrates the immense restrictions placed upon North Korean citizens. The differences go beyond the availability of apps and extend to basic freedom of speech and expression.
The comments about the phone sparked wider discussions about censorship and digital surveillance, not just in North Korea but globally. Many pointed out that while North Korea’s methods may be exceptionally blunt, many companies in the West also utilize sophisticated monitoring tools on employees’ computers for security and productivity reasons. This raises concerns about the balance between security and privacy, and whether the level of monitoring justified in a corporate setting translates to similar justification in the context of a state-run surveillance system.
However, amidst the discussion of the technical aspects and broader political implications, many voiced concern for the North Korean people themselves, highlighting that many live in profound ignorance of the larger world and the extent of their oppression. This led to a debate on whether it is more merciful for people to remain unaware or if knowledge, even painful knowledge, is a necessary part of self-determination.
Ultimately, the smuggled North Korean phone is more than just a technological artifact; it is a window into a world drastically different from our own. It demonstrates the power of a repressive regime to control information and monitor its citizens with increasingly sophisticated methods, and reminds us of the importance of freedom of speech, access to information, and the privacy of individuals. The story’s unusual quirks, from the swimwear photo to the inconsistent technical choices, only serve to underscore the sheer strangeness and severity of the situation.