By Matt Underwood No Kings protest organizers have announced July 17th as the date for their next demonstration, generating considerable discussion online about the choice of day. The announcement itself follows the momentum of previous protests, aiming to maintain pressure on Congress and counter the influence of what some perceive as a powerful media narrative surrounding Trumpism. Organizers emphasize the importance of consistent action to demonstrate widespread opposition and encourage attendees from the previous protest to return and bring new participants.
The selection of a weekday, specifically a Thursday, has proven to be a point of contention among potential attendees. Many express concern that holding the protest mid-week will significantly reduce attendance compared to the previous demonstration, which likely had higher turnout due to its weekend scheduling. Concerns are raised about the impact on working individuals, with some commenting that a Thursday protest will make it impossible for them to participate. The potential for a significantly smaller turnout is viewed as a risk to maintaining the movement’s momentum.
Several alternative dates are suggested, with July 4th—Independence Day—being a recurring recommendation. The symbolic significance of this date, representing a declaration of independence from tyranny, is seen as a perfect opportunity for a powerful demonstration, aligning the protest with the nation’s celebratory spirit while enhancing its message. The perceived missed opportunity is palpable in many comments, highlighting the potential for increased participation and impact a weekend date would have provided. The contrast between the symbolic weight of July 4th and the practical constraints of a Thursday underscores the debate about maximizing impact versus feasibility.
The debate extends beyond the simple choice of date. Some suggest that protests should ideally be held every weekend to build momentum gradually. This approach acknowledges the challenges of maintaining participation and engagement but champions the importance of consistent action for a sustained impact. Others advocate for a different approach, arguing that inconveniencing the general public and disrupting the economy through strategically planned weekday protests might be a more effective tactic. This viewpoint emphasizes the need to demonstrate resolve and make a bold statement. While some see the weekday protest as a sacrifice that may result in a smaller crowd, others believe that sacrificing convenience is key to making a point.
Suggestions extend beyond scheduling, touching upon practical aspects of organizing the event. Ideas like having voter registration tables at the protest to promote civic engagement are put forward. Many express concern that the “No Kings” theme might be too subtle or sophisticated for a broad audience, suggesting a more direct and easily understood slogan, like “Fuck Trump,” to attract a wider participation. There is a common thread in the comments suggesting a need for better communication and coordination among organizers and attendees.
Despite the concerns over the chosen date, the overall sentiment remains one of support for the protest. Many express their intention to attend despite the weekday scheduling, and some emphasize the importance of making an effort to participate, emphasizing that protests are not always convenient but are nevertheless necessary. The comments suggest a commitment to maintaining the momentum of the movement, with several individuals already planning strategies to recruit friends and colleagues to participate.
The discussion concludes with several broader suggestions. These include calls for a mid-week general strike to add a more significant economic dimension to the protests, or the creation of further protests around other themes, such as the prevention of new wars. The desire to expand the protest beyond national borders and take the movement international is also voiced. The overarching tone suggests a determined commitment to continue the fight, even with the acknowledged challenges of scheduling and maximizing attendance.