By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Olabisi Onabanjo University in Nigeria is facing widespread condemnation for a policy requiring female students to undergo physical checks for bras before exams. A viral video depicts female staff touching students’ chests to enforce the dress code, which a student leader defended as maintaining a distraction-free environment, though acknowledging the need for alternative enforcement methods. Critics, including a human rights group, have condemned the practice as a violation of students’ rights and likened it to sexual assault. The university’s student union president stated the policy aims for a respectful environment, but is exploring alternative approaches to enforcing modesty guidelines.
Read the original article here
The “no-bra, no-exam” rule implemented at Olabisi Onabanjo University in Nigeria has ignited a firestorm of outrage and sparked a passionate debate about sexism, consent, and the absurdity of the policy itself. The reported practice of female staff physically checking students’ chests to ensure bra adherence is particularly troubling. This act is not only deeply invasive and demeaning but also highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of a “distraction-free” exam environment.
The suggestion that female students’ bodies are inherently distracting to male students perpetuates a harmful stereotype that places the responsibility for male behavior on women. The very idea that a woman’s choice of undergarment could impede a male student’s concentration during an exam is absurd and reveals a deeply ingrained bias. Shouldn’t the focus be on fostering a respectful and focused learning environment for everyone, rather than policing women’s bodies?
The argument that this policy is a necessary component of the university’s dress code is equally unconvincing. If the goal is to create an environment free of distractions, a more effective and less invasive approach would be to address inappropriate behavior directly, rather than subjecting female students to humiliating physical checks. The university’s silence on the matter only fuels the outrage and raises serious concerns about its commitment to the safety and well-being of its female students.
The sheer audacity of the physical checks – touching students’ chests – is appalling. This act, irrespective of intent, constitutes a violation of personal space and a breach of trust between students and staff. It’s reminiscent of much more problematic scenarios and sets a deeply concerning precedent within the institution. Such blatant disregard for student dignity is unacceptable within any educational setting, let alone a university.
Furthermore, the selective application of this rule—targeting female students while leaving male students unchecked—is inherently sexist. The implicit assumption is that men are inherently unable to control their gaze and concentration while women are solely responsible for managing the potential “distraction” they might pose. This deeply rooted inequality is the core issue at play here, making this much more than just a flawed dress code policy.
It’s also important to note the hypocrisy of the situation. While the argument for this rule centers on the supposed distraction of female students’ bodies, it overlooks the possibility of other factors contributing to a non-conducive exam environment. For example, the behavior of the male students themselves could be equally disruptive, yet this rule focuses exclusively on regulating female students’ bodies.
The notion that the presence or absence of a bra impacts academic performance is ludicrous. The comparison with other instances of dress code violations, such as spaghetti straps, is only a further testament to the superficiality of this policy. Instead of focusing on the minutiae of undergarments, the institution should concentrate on more effective ways to maintain discipline and focus within examination settings.
The comments from various people regarding the policy highlight diverse perspectives. Some find the entire situation ridiculous and express deep anger at the sexism inherent in the policy. Others question the underlying assumptions about male gaze and the responsibility of women to manage it. Some even propose equally absurd, but illustrative, counter-measures to demonstrate the absurdity of the original policy. The range of reactions underscores the universal condemnation of this rule and the underlying misogyny it reflects.
The overarching issue is not merely about a dress code; it’s about power dynamics, sexism, and a fundamental lack of respect for female students. The incident exposes the deeper problem of how women are treated and viewed within Nigerian society and underscores the critical need for a serious conversation about consent, respect, and gender equality in education. The silence from the university only serves to amplify the outrage and underscores the urgent need for change. The “no-bra, no-exam” rule is not just a policy; it’s a symptom of a much larger societal problem that deserves immediate and decisive action.