By John Q. Hosedrinker 
NATO assesses Ukraine’s Operation Spider’s Web, targeting Russian strategic aircraft, as highly successful, citing damage to at least 40 aircraft, including the near-total destruction of 10-13. This represents a significant reduction, approximately 34%, in Russia’s long-range missile-carrying aircraft capabilities. While some damaged planes may provide parts, the attack severely limits Russia’s capacity for strategic airstrikes. The operation also underscores Ukraine’s ability to strike deep within Russian territory.
Read the original article here
NATO is hailing Ukraine’s Operation Spider’s Web as a remarkably successful military operation, citing significant damage inflicted on the Russian air force. Preliminary assessments suggest that at least 40 Russian aircraft were damaged, with between 10 and 13 completely destroyed. This represents a substantial blow to Russia’s aerial capabilities, particularly considering the types of aircraft affected.
The operation targeted a variety of high-value assets, including a significant number of strategic bombers. NATO has identified at least 15 Tu-95 strategic bombers and 20 Tu-22 aircraft among the damaged assets. This is especially concerning given that many of these bombers were active, not in reserve or undergoing maintenance, and were reportedly already loaded with ammunition. The sheer number of damaged bombers represents a considerable weakening of Russia’s long-range strike capabilities.
The impact extends beyond just bombers. The loss of at least one A-50 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft is also noteworthy. AWACS planes are rare and crucial for Russia’s air defense, making this loss particularly significant, especially given the claim that Russia only has a handful of these active systems in its arsenal. Some reports even suggest that this specific A-50 may have been a parts donor, lacking essential components, yet even the destruction of this particular plane puts additional strain on an already limited fleet.
The overall assessment paints a picture of crippling losses. NATO estimates that the attack destroyed roughly 34% of Russia’s existing missile carriers. This, combined with the bomber losses, represents a significant reduction in Russia’s capacity to launch long-range missile strikes. This might explain the relative lack of recent cruise missile attacks from Russia against Ukraine. The scale of the damage is such that it has been compared to historical naval battles like the Taranto raid, though the geopolitical context differs.
The operation’s success is all the more impressive considering Ukraine’s resources. The level of intelligence and planning required to execute such a precise and devastating attack with seemingly limited resources speaks volumes. The success raises questions about the overall effectiveness of current sanctions. Claims that trading with Russia continues to fund the rebuilding of military assets are significant, suggesting a need for further action to curtail Russia’s ability to replenish its losses.
The long-term impact of Operation Spider’s Web is profound. Russia’s ability to replace these lost aircraft is severely limited. Production lines for these aircraft ceased decades ago during the dissolution of the Soviet Union, making the replacement process incredibly difficult and expensive, even if the financial resources were available. This lack of ability to replace the destroyed aircraft means that these losses are likely permanent, at least in the short to medium term.
The situation underscores the vulnerability of Russia’s aging air force and highlights the effectiveness of Ukraine’s evolving drone warfare capabilities. The operation’s success serves as a potent symbol of Ukraine’s resilience and ingenuity in the face of overwhelming odds. The strategic implications are still being assessed, but it’s undeniable that Operation Spider’s Web has shifted the balance of power in the air, at least for the time being. The future will likely bring a response from Russia, but the extent and nature of that response remain uncertain, raising concerns about potential further escalations and civilian casualties. While the immediate consequences are devastating for Russia, the possibility of retaliation underscores the complex and ongoing nature of the conflict.