By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The media aggressively attempted to undermine Zohran Mamdani’s campaign, with outlets like the *New York Times* and *The Atlantic* criticizing his policies, specifically his proposals for rent control and public services, while dismissing his ideas as impractical. The articles employed selective memory, factual inaccuracies, and even critiques of Mamdani’s youth. Despite this concerted effort, the negative coverage failed to deter voters, highlighting the disconnect between establishment media and the public, as well as the strength of grassroots campaigns. The author warns that despite the victory, the general election will likely see increased pressure from monied interests and the media.
Read the original article here
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani, and it was pretty obvious from the outset. It’s almost comical how predictable it all became, wasn’t it? The focus on his plans – like providing car seats for babies or pushing for a living wage – felt like an intentional misdirection. Instead of engaging with the merits of these ideas, the narrative quickly shifted to fear-mongering. It’s like the more progressive ideas gained traction, the more the scare tactics ramped up. It raises the question, though, of whether these tactics might actually backfire, potentially pushing more people towards candidates like Mamdani.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani by using tactics we’ve seen countless times before: questioning his origins, his age, and even his religion. It’s a classic playbook designed to make him seem “foreign” or “other.” This is especially stark considering how little focus they give to others. This blatant race-baiting is a shameful tactic. The lack of critical analysis of actions by others, particularly those with significant power or resources, reveals a clear bias. How can you defend a narrative of fairness and truth when it’s only applied selectively? It’s a real problem for independent journalists to get their voices heard.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani, but in doing so, they revealed their true colors: a focus on protecting the wealthy and powerful. They’re less concerned about the potential benefits of policies that could help working people and more worried about the bottom line. The endorsements from established media outlets, particularly the blatant anti-endorsement by The New York Times, were a clear sign of where their allegiances lie. To them, it seems, a corrupt figure is preferable to a socialist who isn’t beholden to special interests. This blatant bias feels like a betrayal of the public trust.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani. The relentless coverage of his policies included the all-too-familiar tactics of “red-baiting.” Taking something like a city-run grocery store and using it to evoke images of the Soviet Union is a clear example of their manipulative tactics. This kind of fear-mongering, painting affordable groceries as something inherently bad, feels like a deliberate attempt to sabotage. It’s a shame when you realize that the media, owned by the capital class, is far from being an ally.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani by pushing a narrative that was clearly crafted to dissuade voters. It’s not surprising that billionaires and corporate interests would line up against a candidate who threatens their wealth and power. The failures of capitalism have left many people feeling vulnerable, and the term “socialism” doesn’t carry the same negative weight it once did. The media’s lack of awareness of this shift is startling, and it highlights how out of touch they are with the concerns of ordinary people.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani. There’s a sense that the established media is not interested in actually covering the issues or letting voters make informed decisions. It’s as if they want to manufacture fear and division to maintain the status quo. This type of behavior is nothing new. And the fact that independent voices and progressive candidates like Zohran Mamdani are succeeding despite the media onslaught is a testament to the shifting political landscape.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani. The goal seemed to be to demonize him and his platform, which is exactly what happens when a candidate challenges the existing power structure. The relentless attacks and the spreading of misinformation are a testament to his threat to the establishment.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani through a barrage of propaganda. They’re trying to paint him as antisemitic, likely using the same tactics they’ve used to smear others in the past. The idea of “far-left” media is a farce. They are just as beholden to corporate interests as their more conservative counterparts. There’s no way that they are going to support anyone who represents real change.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani. He’s the kind of candidate who is smart, unafraid, and actually means what he says. That’s exactly why they’re afraid. The media’s job is to manipulate the narrative, not to serve the public interest. The relentless focus on the negative and the ignoring of the positive are clear examples of yellow journalism in action.
Media did their best to scare voters away from Zohran Mamdani. The media will continue their campaign of fear-mongering and misinformation. They are trying to play on people’s fears and insecurities to keep them from supporting a candidate who actually has the interests of the working class at heart. He and Adams will be splitting the vote and making deals with big money donors. This is the game, and the public is increasingly aware of it. They are missing that real progressives are more popular than trotting out establishment figures. The wealth inequality is staggering, and they’re not on the side of those who are suffering.