By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following his primary victory, Zohran Mamdani returned to the campaign trail, making an appearance at the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network (NAN). Mamdani emphasized the need for an affordable city, citing issues such as rent, childcare, and groceries. Despite some support for Andrew Cuomo in the surrounding area, Mamdani aimed to win over more voters, with the crowd expressing interest in his policies while seeking concrete implementation plans. The event marked his second visit to the NAN, aiming to address critical issues within the community.
Read the original article here
Mamdani heads to Harlem to win over Cuomo voters.
Mamdani’s strategy of trying to win over Cuomo voters in Harlem is a complex play, particularly given the history and nuances of the political landscape. It’s clear from the discussion that there’s a real question mark around the appeal of Cuomo to Black voters, given the allegations of corruption and his track record. Many are genuinely puzzled by the continued support for Cuomo. The suggestion that perhaps there are deals with the GOP, along with the former governor’s high profile, has further added to this discussion. Some people think Mamdani’s chances are slim and that there is no chance.
Black voters, as a group, don’t always have the same political priorities as progressive white voters. There seems to be a degree of pragmatism at play. There is a certain tendency to choose the candidate who is seen as most electable, even if they don’t perfectly align with all values and goals. This has been compared to the Biden-Sanders situation in the past, with a focus on securing a win to prevent a potentially worse outcome. However, some individuals and communities may be in the past, voting out of fear rather than hope.
A critical aspect of understanding this dynamic lies in the role of name recognition and historical voting patterns. Many older Black voters, recognizing the historical stakes, tend to prioritize supporting established Democratic candidates. There’s a belief, fueled by experience, that the stakes are simply too high to take chances. This often leads to supporting mainstream, establishment candidates. This is reinforced by the narrative that the progressive left’s engagement with Black voters often feels paternalistic or out of touch.
The challenges are significant for Mamdani. He has to overcome historical voting patterns, the perception of being anti-Israel in some circles, and the potential for Republicans to coalesce around any candidate other than him. The discussion highlights the potential for a fractured opposition, particularly if multiple candidates vie for the same votes. This fragmentation is a major threat to the election and can severely damage a unified front.
The impact of propaganda also influences voters. Decades of anti-socialist messaging have had an effect on the electorate, and it can be tough to fight. Some voters have been swayed and vote conservatively, supporting more moderate candidates. Mamdani is offering real policies and solutions to help average New Yorkers, but he needs to overcome Cuomo’s established presence and the narratives that he will try to create.
There’s also the issue of how voters prioritize interests. Some marginalized groups, having suffered under neoliberalism, might lean towards candidates critical of the status quo, but this isn’t always the case. Class interests are often overlooked in favor of name recognition and party loyalty. This is where the vote of some Black voters seems to be.
The importance of Black voters and their potential influence is repeatedly discussed. They have substantial potential and could change the outcome of many elections, including mayoral races in New York. If Black voters come out in full force, they can have an enormous impact, but will they? The future of the election in Harlem and beyond depends on it.