By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A lawsuit filed by SMART Legislation demands a full hand recount of Rockland County, New York’s 2024 election ballots. The suit cites discrepancies, including zero votes for Vice President Kamala Harris in one district despite significant votes for other Democratic candidates in the same district, and statistically improbable results across several towns. A judge has ordered the recount following evidence suggesting underreporting of votes for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare. This action stems from concerns about the accuracy of both presidential and state senate election results.
Read the original article here
A lawsuit challenging the 2024 election results is moving forward after the discovery that Vice President Kamala Harris received zero votes in certain New York County districts. This astonishing finding raises serious questions about the integrity of the election process. The sheer improbability of such an outcome in districts where other Democratic candidates received significant votes immediately suggests a potential systemic issue.
The reported data reveals a startling disparity. In Rockland County, NY district 35, 331 voters selected Kirsten Gillibrand for State Senate, yet none cast a ballot for Harris in the presidential race. Similarly, district 55 shows 909 votes for Gillibrand, with only two for Harris. This points towards a highly unusual pattern that warrants a thorough investigation.
This discrepancy isn’t simply a matter of voter apathy or a lack of enthusiasm for Harris. The numbers are far too extreme to be explained by typical voter behavior. The almost complete absence of votes for the Democratic presidential candidate, while other Democrats on the same ballot received substantial support, strongly indicates something more sinister than just voters choosing to select some candidates and not others.
The timing of this revelation also adds to the intrigue. Why is this information surfacing now, rather than months ago, closer to the election itself? The delay only intensifies the need for a comprehensive investigation into the irregularities. The lack of immediate action after the election raises concerns about the responsiveness and accountability of election officials.
There are some who have pointed out that this is similar to other claims of vote tampering. The parallels to allegations surrounding other elections cannot be ignored. The sheer magnitude of the discrepancy however, pushes this case into a realm that is difficult to explain away as just simple statistical anomaly or even isolated incidents.
The silence from the Democratic Party in the months following the election is also notable. The party’s lack of visible investigation into the reported irregularities makes this situation much more puzzling. The fact that this lawsuit is now receiving attention based on a grassroots investigation, rather than an official inquiry, is equally concerning.
Adding fuel to the fire are accusations about the involvement of influential figures. Allegations surrounding Elon Musk’s role in potentially manipulating voting machines have been raised previously, and the timing of these accusations in relation to this unfolding lawsuit raises new questions. His previous statements about his involvement in the election need to be investigated thoroughly.
The scale of potential manipulation is staggering. The claim that a major presidential candidate received zero votes in multiple districts is a dramatic assertion. This is an anomaly that cannot be easily dismissed. If accurate, it casts severe doubt on the legitimacy of the election results.
The fact that this pattern was discovered in multiple districts also strengthens the case for a widespread systematic issue. Isolated incidents of voter fraud are certainly concerning, but the consistency across multiple districts significantly increases the likelihood of a coordinated or systemic problem affecting the reliability of the election itself.
The possibility of election fraud on this scale should set off alarm bells across the political spectrum. It underscores the need for enhanced election security measures and for greater transparency in the electoral process. The potential consequences of not fully investigating this claim are enormous. This is a situation that demands a swift and thorough investigation to ensure public trust in the integrity of the election. The pursuit of justice and the upholding of democratic principles necessitates immediate action to address this serious challenge. The need to restore faith in the electoral system, and the urgent imperative to uncover the truth, make this an issue that cannot be ignored.