By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On June 10th, 2025, a large-scale Russian attack using ballistic missiles and drones targeted Kyiv and Odesa, resulting in casualties and significant damage. In Kyiv, four people were injured, and historical sites like St. Sophia Cathedral were struck. Odesa suffered two fatalities and at least eight injuries, with infrastructure including a maternity hospital and film studio damaged. Ukrainian air defenses intercepted a significant portion of the launched projectiles (213 drones and 7 missiles), but the attack underscored Russia’s continued aggression despite international peace efforts. This followed a similarly large-scale attack the previous day.
Read the original article here
A recent Russian missile and drone barrage targeted Kyiv and Odesa, resulting in one death and eight injuries. The attack also inflicted damage on a maternity hospital, a particularly egregious act given the vulnerability of the location and its inhabitants. The sheer brutality of striking a maternity hospital underscores the devastating consequences of this conflict, highlighting the human cost far beyond official casualty counts.
The effectiveness, or rather the ineffectiveness, of the Russian attacks is striking. Launching a large-scale barrage, involving significant resources and complexity, only to inflict single-digit casualties raises serious questions about their targeting capabilities. This begs the question: are the reported casualties a true reflection of the damage inflicted, or are Ukrainian losses significantly underreported? The disparity between the scale of the attack and the relatively low number of casualties is puzzling, particularly given the precision weaponry employed by both sides.
The deliberate targeting of civilian areas, including hospitals, is an undeniable violation of international humanitarian law. These attacks inflict not only physical harm but also profound psychological trauma, forcing civilians to live under constant fear. This consistent targeting of non-combatants, especially vulnerable groups like mothers and newborns in a maternity hospital, speaks to a level of callousness that is deeply disturbing.
Many argue that the relatively low casualty numbers are a direct result of Ukraine’s robust air defenses. The effectiveness of these defenses, often supplied by Western nations, is demonstrably reducing the impact of Russian attacks. The systems allow for early warning, giving civilians time to reach safety, thus lessening the number of direct casualties, though damage to buildings and infrastructure remains substantial. This also explains the higher proportion of casualties resulting from falling debris from intercepted missiles and drones.
The ongoing attacks serve a clear purpose, namely to instill terror amongst the civilian population. By systematically targeting civilian infrastructure, Russia aims to undermine morale and break the spirit of the Ukrainian people. It’s a tactic of attrition, seeking to wear down civilian resolve through fear and constant disruption. However, this strategy does little to address the core issues of the conflict, and may in fact fuel further determination in the face of such blatant disregard for human life.
Various attempts to rationalize these attacks are often floated, including claims that Ukrainian forces are using hospitals for military purposes. However, these claims lack credible evidence and are widely dismissed as attempts to justify the unjustifiable. There’s no concrete evidence supporting the idea of military bases or significant weapons storage within hospitals, or other civilian infrastructure, and such claims do little to diminish the heinous nature of these actions.
The contrast between the significant resources devoted to these attacks and their limited impact on the battlefield only amplifies the perceived ineptitude of Russian military strategy. Targeting vulnerable civilians seems to serve a purpose of undermining morale, spreading fear, and garnering international attention. But this approach is counter-productive, serving only to further alienate Russia on the world stage and strengthening the resolve of its adversaries.
The international community’s response, or lack thereof, is a crucial factor. Debate continues regarding the best way to respond, with some advocating for direct military intervention. Such actions carry substantial risks, however, as they could escalate the conflict into a much larger, potentially catastrophic, confrontation. Others argue that bolstering Ukraine’s defenses through the provision of advanced weaponry and intelligence is the more prudent approach. The goal remains the same: to end the needless suffering, but the methods remain hotly debated.
Ultimately, the attack on the maternity hospital and the continued targeting of civilian infrastructure underscore the brutal reality of this conflict and raise serious ethical questions about the conduct of warfare. The deliberate targeting of civilians, regardless of justification, is unacceptable. The world must continue to call out these violations and hold those responsible accountable, whether through international tribunals or other forms of justice. The inhumane targeting of civilians needs to end, and a path to peace needs to be found, even if that path seems dauntingly difficult to navigate at this juncture.