By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Licensed gun dealers in Iowa, like Kemlin Hart of Hart Brothers, are not seeing a significant increase in business despite new legislation. While the new law allows 18 to 20-year-olds to own and carry firearms and buy them through private sales, they still cannot purchase guns from licensed dealers due to federal regulations. This creates potential complications for dealers as they navigate the legality of family members gifting firearms to this age group, potentially triggering concerns about straw purchasing. Hart anticipates that the new law aims to allow immediate family members to gift or sell firearms to those aged 18 to 20, provided it is not part of a straw purchase.
Read the original article here
New Iowa gun law to allow 18-year-olds to carry firearms, and it’s sparking quite the conversation, isn’t it? The general vibe seems to be a mix of opinions, ranging from outright support to deep skepticism, with a good dose of “what does this even mean?” thrown in for good measure.
So, let’s break it down. Apparently, the law change specifically targets handguns, which previously had a 21-year-old minimum. Long guns, it seems, were already accessible to 18-year-olds. Now, with this new law, 18-year-olds in Iowa can legally carry handguns. The immediate reaction is often confusion, a fair question to ask, especially when considering the existing age restrictions on things like alcohol.
The core of the debate really seems to revolve around what constitutes adulthood. If you’re old enough to vote, serve in the military (and potentially be issued a firearm by the government), and be held responsible for your actions in many other ways, shouldn’t you also have the right to carry a handgun? That’s a pretty common argument, and it’s hard to dismiss the logic. Some people think that if you are an adult, you should be treated as such. The inconsistencies in the current laws often come up – like, you can’t buy alcohol, but you can potentially own a deadly weapon.
There’s a valid point about consistency. In many ways, society seems to be sending mixed messages. It grants 18-year-olds many adult responsibilities but simultaneously restricts them in other areas, and it leaves people asking why. If the core issue is maturity and responsible decision-making, the arguments become even more complex. The point often raised is that not everyone is “ready” at 18.
Furthermore, there are those who question the practicality and the potential outcomes. Some believe that this is a dangerous idea. It can be reasonably stated that young people may not have the life experience to handle the serious responsibility that comes with carrying a firearm. There are also those who feel that the law is not an indicator of progress.
There’s also the inevitable comparison to other states and countries. Many states already allow 18-year-olds to carry firearms in various ways, and some people see it as a non-issue, or that the sky hasn’t fallen in these places. Of course, others point to countries with different approaches, like Canada, where the age for many adult activities is 18.
One of the more pointed criticisms is the perceived lack of urgency in addressing this issue. With so many other pressing problems in society, why is this even a priority? Some people are quick to say that this is just pandering to a specific political base.
It is also important to remember the legal ramifications. Carrying a firearm comes with significant responsibilities. Understanding the laws, knowing when and how to use a weapon, and the potential legal consequences of any actions, are all crucial. The fact that the new law might lead to an increase in gun ownership, combined with the legal complications, can lead to a rise in the number of people incarcerated, and not necessarily for the reasons that they would like to be there for.
The issue has many angles. There are arguments about the Second Amendment and its interpretation. Some interpret it to mean that age limits are unconstitutional. There are those who believe this is a step toward individual liberty and self-defense, and those who foresee an increase in gun violence.
It is important to consider that the situation can be more complicated for family members.