By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Approximately 50 detainees at the Delaney Hall ICE facility in Newark, New Jersey, rioted due to prolonged delays and dissatisfaction with meal service. The inmates, housed in a third-floor dormitory, breached a wall and hung bedsheets, suggesting an attempted escape. Responding authorities, clad in tactical gear, arrived at the scene, and protestors outside the facility reported smelling gas. Mayor Baraka condemned the incident, citing inadequate oversight and demanding answers from the GEO Group and DHS.
Read the original article here
ICE detainees at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, New Jersey, recently staged an uprising, culminating in the demolition of a dormitory wall. The incident, reported by a lawyer, highlights the increasingly volatile conditions within the detention center. It appears the catalyst for the protest was a significant delay in meal service, leaving detainees without food for hours. This lack of basic provision underscores serious failings in the facility’s management and raises profound ethical questions about the treatment of individuals held in ICE custody.
The delay in providing meals is simply unacceptable. Providing regular, adequate meals should be a fundamental aspect of running any detention facility, regardless of the detainees’ immigration status. The fact that this basic necessity wasn’t met points to a systemic problem of neglect and incompetence. The detainees’ anger and frustration are entirely understandable given the circumstances.
This uprising also forces us to confront the larger context of ICE detention. Many detainees haven’t received due process, and in some cases, their legal rights have been completely disregarded. They were effectively “kidnapped” after hearings, adding to the already severe deprivation of liberty. It is a stark reminder of the significant power imbalance inherent in the detention system. This lack of due process, combined with the apparent disregard for basic human needs, fuels the sense of injustice that fueled the protest.
The protest itself is a powerful expression of dissent and desperation. The fact that approximately fifty inmates were able to collectively overcome the physical barriers, pushing down a section of the dormitory wall, demonstrates the level of collective determination and action within the facility. It is a powerful demonstration of the detainees’ resolve to make their plight known. Their act of defiance serves as a visual representation of the constraints, frustrations, and desperation they experience daily.
The facility’s apparent inability to effectively manage basic logistics, like meal provision, casts significant doubt on the ability of the authorities to provide proper care for those in their custody. There are also concerns about overcrowding. Many are pointing to the potential dangers of a lack of food and resources in an already overcrowded environment. This situation mirrors various historical events, including the treatment of prisoners of war and other marginalized groups throughout history, prompting comparisons to the horrifying situations seen in the past.
The incident has also highlighted the broader political context, linking the situation to the Trump administration’s policies and anti-immigrant rhetoric. The president’s actions and statements have been brought into question, particularly regarding issues such as the treatment of national guard and marine personnel. The apparent lack of concern for those in custody mirrors the treatment of US personnel, suggesting a pattern of disregard for the well-being of individuals under the administration’s control.
The timing of the protest, occurring on the anniversary of Reagan’s famous “tear down this wall” speech, is particularly ironic. The wall the detainees tore down wasn’t a metaphorical one; it was a physical barrier within a detention facility, symbolizing the confinement and oppression they face. It raises the question of whether these are conditions acceptable within the United States of America. The irony isn’t lost on anyone, and the juxtaposition of these two events further illuminates the situation’s severity.
Many see this incident as a wake-up call. The conditions at Delaney Hall are not isolated incidents; they are indicative of larger systemic problems within the ICE detention system. The lack of accountability and the seemingly callous disregard for human rights warrant urgent investigation and reform. The lack of adequate food, the overcrowding, and the lack of due process all contribute to an inhumane environment. It brings up uncomfortable questions about the true nature of these detention facilities, whether they are more akin to concentration camps than places of temporary housing.
The fact that these detainees, many of whom are skilled laborers – possibly construction workers – were able to successfully breach a wall highlights the limitations of the facility’s security measures and underscores the level of desperation driving the protest. This event calls for immediate action; whether it is a reassessment of practices, a review of security, or something more. This is a human rights issue and requires immediate attention and solution. The lack of proper food and treatment are major problems that need to be solved immediately. The incident at Delaney Hall demands a thorough investigation, accountability for those responsible for the detainees’ suffering, and systemic reforms to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future. The future will judge how we handle this crisis.