By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. Department of Defense will permanently cease processing and transmitting microwave data from its three weather satellites by June 30, 2025, which will significantly impact hurricane forecasts. This decision, motivated by security concerns, means the loss of data from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounder (SSMIS) will severely impede hurricane forecasts for the 2025 season. The discontinuation will halve the availability of critical microwave data, increasing the risk of missing important details about rapid intensification, misplacing storms, and degrading forecast accuracy, ultimately impacting tens of millions of Americans.
Read the original article here
Critical hurricane forecast tool abruptly terminated. This is a headline that immediately grabs your attention, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of thing that makes you sit up and take notice, especially if you live anywhere near a coastline. And the more you dig into it, the more unsettling it becomes. The idea that a tool crucial to predicting and preparing for hurricanes – a tool that directly impacts public safety and can literally mean the difference between life and death – has been abruptly terminated is, frankly, terrifying.
The core of the issue, as I understand it, boils down to the Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounder (SSMIS) data. This data has been used to help understand and predict hurricanes. It’s like a key piece of the puzzle, allowing meteorologists to see the inner workings of a storm, particularly when it’s far out at sea and not easily observed by other methods. The immediate consequence is that the ability to accurately forecast hurricane strength, track, and intensity is severely degraded. We’re talking about a potential for significantly larger forecast errors, particularly in those crucial days leading up to landfall. And as anyone who has lived through a hurricane knows, those few days of warning are absolutely critical for evacuation and preparation.
The situation gets more complicated, and frankly, a lot more frustrating, when you look at the bigger picture. It’s not just a technical issue; there are clear indications that this decision is influenced by political motivations. There’s this notion that some folks, for whatever reason, are uncomfortable with the scientific consensus on climate change and its effect on hurricanes. The NOAA and the National Hurricane Center, both important institutions that collect and interpret data and provide forecasts, are seen as central players in “the climate change alarm industry”. It seems that there are political forces who don’t want this climate data to be available for the public or independent scientific research.
If this is the case, this becomes something much more than just a matter of equipment failure. This is about access to information, and the implications are frankly scary. It feels like a deliberate attempt to limit public access to critical weather data. We’re talking about millions of Americans living in hurricane-prone areas, potentially losing access to accurate, life-saving information.
This is not something that should be treated lightly. There are real-world consequences for this. Buildings, infrastructure, and millions of families are put at risk by such a decision. It feels like a blatant disregard for the safety and well-being of the population. Coastal towns will be left in the dark, forced to make critical decisions without the benefit of the most accurate information possible. What are we supposed to do? Hope for the best? That’s simply not enough.
The impact is not just on individual safety, either. Weather forecasts generate billions of dollars based on those predictions. Imagine the economic devastation of a hurricane, and then magnify that by the potential for less accurate warnings. This could be another nail in the coffin for the US economy.
The fact that it coincides with a political climate where some want to downplay the effects of climate change is even more worrying. We’re essentially being asked to ignore the potential for more intense storms while simultaneously limiting the tools we have to understand and prepare for them. It’s like they are trying to “cull the herd”. Some are even saying “Trump wants to be king, but what’s the point if there’s nothing and no one left to rule?”
Now, let’s be clear, the situation is nuanced. The equipment in question has reached the end of its lifecycle. The DMSP program is being phased out, and newer systems are in development. But there is a concerning gap, and that gap is dangerous, because there’s not enough data to go around right now.
Regardless, it feels like a massive step backward. In a world increasingly threatened by extreme weather events, cutting back on the tools that help us prepare seems like a catastrophic misstep. Instead of investing in better forecasting capabilities, we seem to be moving in the opposite direction. The data is being kept for the Department of Defense, so what deals are being made to make sure the general public gets this important information?
The worst part is that the public will suffer. And it just feels wrong. People need to know what’s coming so they can make informed decisions. To think that access to this information might be restricted for political reasons is infuriating. This is not just about politics; it’s about public safety. It is about the basic right to be warned of impending danger. We need accurate hurricane forecasts. We need access to the data that makes those forecasts possible. It’s that simple. And right now, it feels like we’re losing both.