By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Germany’s military procurement chief, Annette Lehnigk-Emden, announced a three-year deadline for acquiring necessary equipment to counter potential Russian aggression against NATO. This ambitious rearmament plan, fueled by increased defense spending and spurred by warnings of a possible 2029 Russian attack, prioritizes heavy equipment like Skyranger anti-aircraft tanks. The goal is to create a powerful conventional army, necessitating significant troop increases to approximately 203,000 soldiers by 2031. This accelerated modernization reflects pressure from both the US and Germany’s own government.
Read the original article here
Germany’s armed forces have three years to acquire the necessary equipment to defend against a potential Russian attack on NATO territory, according to the head of military procurement. This ambitious timeline presents significant challenges.
One major hurdle is the possibility of equipping the German army based on an outdated combat doctrine. The rapid changes brought about by the Ukraine War necessitate a swift and significant adaptation. Russia’s current struggle against Ukraine, despite a massive military build-up spanning decades, highlights the limitations of sheer size and outdated equipment. Russia’s experience demonstrates the debilitating impact of attrition warfare when facing a modern, well-equipped opponent. While the scale of Russia’s expenditure of resources and manpower is alarming, their struggles in Ukraine suggest that a similar scenario against a modernized NATO force would be exceedingly difficult. The three-year timeframe is ambitious, but perhaps achievable if Germany prioritizes efficiency and resource allocation.
However, some question whether a three-year window is sufficient. While a Russian attack on NATO territory remains a distinct possibility requiring preparation, its likelihood is a point of debate. The protracted and costly nature of the Ukraine war, along with the significant losses suffered by the Russian military, have cast doubt on Russia’s capacity to launch a successful large-scale offensive against multiple NATO nations simultaneously. Russia’s current inability to decisively overcome Ukraine, even with the deployment of substantial resources, raises questions about their capability to handle a more formidable opponent. This is particularly true considering the modern military capabilities of NATO members.
Despite this, the potential threat warrants preparedness. Germany, along with other NATO members, needs to prepare for all contingencies. This involves not only purchasing modern equipment, but also building a substantial strategic reserve. Focusing solely on high-tech weaponry without sufficient numbers to equip and maintain multiple units would be an incomplete solution. Russia’s military industrial output is immense, which cannot be overlooked and needs to be accounted for. The possibility of a Russian incursion into the Baltic states, potentially creating a stalemate, must not be dismissed. This necessitates an integrated approach to defense, encompassing land, sea, and air capabilities, while also considering the lessons learned in Ukraine.
The Ukrainian conflict has revealed the effectiveness of drone warfare, and Germany could benefit from investing in advanced drone technology, including swarm tactics, for both offensive and defensive operations. However, focusing solely on technological advancements will not fully solve the issue; a substantial increase in the quantity of conventional weaponry is also critical. The need for air superiority should not be underestimated, requiring a substantial investment in air power. Meanwhile, Germany’s current reliance on energy imports leaves them vulnerable, highlighting the urgent need to secure alternative energy sources.
The relative success of Ukraine in repelling a larger adversary should not be misinterpreted as implying an easy victory for NATO against Russia. While Ukraine’s military has received significant support from NATO nations, their success has also been partly fueled by the adaptability and bravery of their troops. Although Ukraine has demonstrated resilience and innovative tactics, it’s important to avoid underestimating Russia’s capabilities and potential for adaptation, even after their considerable setbacks in Ukraine. Comparisons between Germany’s military capabilities and those of other NATO members such as France or the UK should be viewed with caution and serve to highlight areas for improvement in Germany’s defense readiness. Any assessment must consider specific scenarios and available resources.
The claim that Russia is vastly weaker than initially perceived needs to be balanced with the potential for them to learn and adapt from their mistakes. Although Russia has performed poorly in Ukraine, attributing their struggles solely to incompetence would be negligent. The Ukrainian conflict has provided a wealth of data and insights, showing the importance of combined arms warfare, effective logistics, and the morale of troops.
Ultimately, the three-year deadline presents a significant challenge but not an insurmountable one. It necessitates immediate and decisive action to modernize the German armed forces, ensure sufficient quantities of equipment, and implement a robust defense strategy. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine offers vital lessons that must inform this modernization process and prepare for the unforeseen. While the possibility of a Russian attack on NATO territory might appear remote to some, the potential consequences of such an attack demand a level of preparedness commensurate with the risk.