By John Q. Hosedrinker 
GE Appliances announced a $490 million project that will bring the production of clothes washers from China to its Louisville, Kentucky complex, creating 800 new jobs. This investment will make the company the largest U.S. manufacturer of washing machines and aligns with its “zero-distance” business strategy to manufacture appliances closer to consumers. The project will involve shifting production of combo washer/dryers and front-load washers, expanding the production area to the equivalent of 33 football fields by 2027. This move is part of the company’s broader strategy to increase U.S. manufacturing and builds on previous investments in its Appliance Park facilities.
Read the original article here
GE Appliances moves washing machine production from China to Kentucky with $490 million investment. This is a significant shift in manufacturing, and it’s interesting to unpack what it really means. The company’s decision to bring washing machine production to Kentucky with such a large investment is a headline grabber, no doubt.
The redesigned factory will become its most advanced manufacturing plant for clothes washing production, the company said, featuring the latest in automation, robotics, and material-handling technologies including automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots. The inclusion of advanced technologies like automation and robotics is a key detail. While it signals progress in terms of manufacturing capabilities, it also raises questions about the nature of the jobs being created and the overall impact on the workforce. It’s a win for the technology, but not necessarily a win for all the workers.
Interestingly, this move is happening under the umbrella of a Chinese company. GE Appliances was acquired by the Chinese appliance corporation Haier in 2016. This means that while the assembly is moving to the US, the parts might still be sourced from China. The implications of this are pretty crucial: it’s not necessarily a complete “return” of manufacturing to the US, but a strategic shift in the assembly process. This setup might allow the company to avoid tariffs on finished appliances and potentially save on costs related to individual parts.
The announcement is happening alongside efforts to lure factories back to the United States by imposing import taxes—tariffs—on foreign goods. The aim is to make it more expensive to manufacture overseas and more appealing to do it domestically. This context highlights how the current economic policies are playing a role in these corporate decisions, which would influence where they choose to set up shop.
A concern brought up in several perspectives is the quality of GE appliances. The company’s reputation for reliability and build quality is questioned, and the fear is that the move to Kentucky won’t change that. Some suggest that these appliances are deliberately engineered to fail, essentially forcing consumers to replace them sooner rather than later.
The move to Kentucky also raises questions about labor costs. There are suggestions that the company is trying to pay workers in Kentucky less than what they were paying in China. This has implications on the cost of these machines, as a new location may not necessarily bring the price down.
A key point to consider is that automation will be central to the Kentucky plant. The plant will employ a lot of automation and robotics, and the number of actual jobs generated might not be as significant as the investment suggests. This means that while there will be new positions, the jobs may require different skill sets and not be as numerous as one might initially assume. The expectation is that the cost of appliances will increase, as more expensive jobs or more tariffs are involved.
Another perspective is on the energy efficiency aspect. Some comments suggest that a shift away from stringent energy efficiency standards could lead to products that cost more to operate. This further impacts consumers by driving up the overall cost of owning these appliances, regardless of the initial purchase price.
The investment does bring economic benefits to the US. The creation of jobs, particularly in manufacturing, is always a positive development. However, it’s essential to be realistic about the nature of these jobs. While the project will provide about 800 jobs, most are likely to be in highly skilled fields. The real jobs that may be created won’t be that big of a number, so it is important to be realistic.
Many perspectives touch on the fact that this is a case of the automation of work. Automation requires fewer employees, so there will be minimum new jobs. As automation is increasing, the cost of production will be decreased, even when the cost of the product is increased. It’s the future of manufacturing.
Another point to highlight is the potential impact on the supply chain. The shift in production might involve a re-evaluation of the sourcing of components and the logistics of moving these materials to the Kentucky plant. The manufacturing would have to consider tariffs, and more.
Finally, the shift of production is ultimately a business decision. The company clearly believes that it is a cost-effective move. They expect it to yield advantages in terms of production efficiency, shipping, and potentially, even avoiding tariffs. It may also provide tax benefits. It would also be likely that they may not get the benefits they initially imagined, given that many corporations don’t get those benefits.