By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The G-7 nations have agreed to exempt US multinational companies from the global minimum tax, a move that aligns with the interests of President Trump’s government. This “side-by-side” solution allows US companies to be taxed only at home, on both domestic and foreign profits. The agreement was facilitated by proposed changes to the US international tax system, as part of Trump’s domestic policy bill. Ultimately, the OECD will determine the final exemption.
Read the original article here
G-7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from the global minimum tax, and honestly, the whole situation is just a bit bewildering. The initial intention behind this global minimum tax, which was agreed upon by nearly 140 countries back in 2021, was to tackle tax evasion by large multinational corporations. The main culprits? Well, think of the tech giants, the Facebooks, the Googles, and their ilk. So, if the purpose was to rein in those specific entities, then why the exemption for the U.S.? It does make you wonder what the point was in the first place.
It’s a head-scratcher, especially when you consider that this exemption puts American companies in a distinctly advantageous position. If you were a CEO of a multinational based in any other G7 country, wouldn’t you be asking why your company is being unfairly targeted with a tax that American companies get to sidestep? This decision certainly raises questions about fairness and, frankly, whether the G7 is prioritizing its own businesses or inadvertently giving an edge to American ones. To add insult to injury, there are already existing tensions with the US, particularly through tariffs.
Looking back, it seems like what’s going on is a complex game of damage control. The US, with its “America First” stance, had a clause buried in a bill that essentially allowed it to impose “revenge” taxes on foreign companies with “unfair taxes”. The G-7, in the end, decided the lesser of two evils: drop this tax in order to have that clause removed. Because you can’t just cut ties with the US, it takes time to create new trading routes to avoid them. The world is changing, forming new alliances that don’t include the US, which should, in theory, make this kind of pressure less effective in the long run.
Let’s be frank. This isn’t just about tax revenue; it’s about establishing a minimum standard to discourage tax havens. American companies already pay more than the proposed 15 percent. So, what this all boils down to is the G7 bowing to the US. It’s a classic case of the worst offender getting a free pass, and you’re left wondering if the entire exercise was a pointless waste of time. This is an obvious win for US tax payers over businesses, but will the other G7 nations follow the same suit?
It’s not all doom and gloom for Americans though; in many ways, the US system is already different. A US multinational company operating in a country outside the US already pays tax there. If they don’t pay the 15% minimum agreed upon, they’ll just pay their US taxes.
The whole scenario is a bit like the US being a law unto itself. And that’s coming from a deal that was negotiated by the previous US administration.
Now, the biggest money makers, biggest political influencers, and the biggest polluters seem to get all the perks. And we’re left asking ourselves, what is the point of it all? Regular folks are stuck struggling, the environment is suffering, and our standards of living are getting taxed to hell. The system isn’t broken; it’s practically cancerous.
It’s not easy to ignore that the US is being bought and paid for by US multinationals. This just puts one more trade barrier up.
The problem is this deal doesn’t address the underlying issue of tax havens.
The current agreement only allows US corporations to pay domestic US taxes on their profits, which are higher, and the US doesn’t have a foreign profits loophole. So, US corporations already pay more than 15%.