By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The European Commission has proposed a complete phase-out of Russian fossil fuel imports by 2028, citing Russia’s weaponization of energy supplies against the EU. This ban, encompassing gas and oil, will remain in effect regardless of the situation in Ukraine, with existing contracts to be terminated by 2026 or 2028. While facing opposition from Hungary, Slovakia, and Austria, the plan is expected to become EU law. The proposal aims to reduce reliance on Russian energy, currently at 13% for gas imports in 2025, while addressing concerns about circumventing the ban through re-flagging of imports.
Read the original article here
Europe will never return to Russian gas, the European Commission insists. This unwavering stance stems from a recognition that dependence on Russian energy sources poses a significant threat to European security. The reliance on a single supplier, especially one with a history of using energy as a political weapon, has proven to be a major vulnerability. The current situation underscores the need for a more diversified and resilient energy supply.
The recent conflict has acted as a catalyst, accelerating the transition towards renewable energy sources. This transition isn’t merely a reaction to the war; it represents a long-term strategic shift towards energy independence and environmental sustainability. Investment in renewable energy, including solar, wind, and potentially nuclear fusion, is seen as crucial to achieving this objective. This massive undertaking will require substantial financial resources, but the security implications of energy dependence outweigh any short-term economic costs.
However, the path to complete energy independence is not without its challenges. There are significant obstacles to overcome. The immediate need for energy security requires navigating the complexities of short-term solutions while building the long-term infrastructure for renewable energy. The transition from fossil fuels to renewables is a complex process that demands significant investment in new infrastructure, including grid upgrades and storage solutions, which will undoubtedly take time and resources. The need for grid stabilization and peak energy management solutions further complicates matters.
Concerns remain about the potential for short-sighted political maneuvering that might jeopardize the long-term goals of energy diversification. The example of past decisions, such as continued trade with Russia even after the annexation of Crimea, highlights the risk of prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term strategic security. These concerns persist even amid the ongoing transition, with accusations of continued reliance on Russian gas through intermediaries. This situation underscores the need for transparency and accountability to prevent a return to dependence on Russian sources.
The complete cessation of all trade in Russian energy is considered essential for genuine energy independence. Attempts to circumvent sanctions through intermediary countries are seen as undermining the effort to divest from Russian sources. Some argue that allowing any Russian energy imports, even indirectly, sends a mixed signal and undermines the impact of sanctions. There’s a sentiment that even a single transaction weakens the message and reduces pressure on Russia.
While the goal is total independence from Russian energy, the idea that Europe would entirely cease using natural gas anytime soon is unrealistic. Natural gas plays a crucial role in numerous industrial processes and its complete removal would trigger serious economic disruptions. The transition must be gradual, allowing industries time to adapt and invest in alternative solutions.
There’s acknowledgment that complete independence from all Russian energy sources is a long-term aspiration. However, even amidst the recognition that absolute independence is a long-term goal, the current emphasis remains firmly on the complete elimination of direct and indirect reliance on Russian gas. The current strategy focuses on strengthening partnerships with alternative suppliers and accelerating the transition to renewable energy sources, thus making reliance on Russia irrelevant.
A complete severing of ties with Russian energy is seen as not just a practical necessity but also a crucial element in deterring future aggression. Energy dependence has been exploited by Russia in the past, and its elimination is seen as crucial for improving long-term stability and security across the EU. This isn’t just about securing energy; it’s about ensuring the safety and freedom of European nations from external pressure. The ultimate goal is achieving energy security to strengthen Europe’s position on the global stage. The commitment to never returning to Russian gas, therefore, is viewed as more than a mere policy decision; it’s a fundamental shift in geopolitical strategy.