By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following military strikes against Iran and heightened terror risk warnings, the appointment of 22-year-old Thomas Fugate, a former Heritage Foundation intern with no prior government leadership or security experience, to a leadership role at the Department of Homeland Security’s Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3) has drawn criticism. The CP3 oversees an $18 million grant program to combat violent extremism, and experts have expressed concern over Fugate’s qualifications, especially as he replaced an Army veteran with over 20 years of national security experience. While CP3 doesn’t engage in law enforcement, officials worry that replacing an experienced leader with someone lacking relevant expertise undermines the agency’s mission of preventing terrorism. Critics note that Fugate’s previous experience includes a brief stint as a gardener and internships, questioning his ability to effectively address complex counterterrorism challenges.
Read the original article here
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience now leading a government terror prevention team is certainly raising eyebrows, and not just the one in his official photo. The sheer audacity of placing someone so green in such a critical role feels like a punchline to a joke no one finds funny. It’s the kind of decision that makes you question the entire vetting process and wonder what qualifications, if any, were actually considered. It’s a situation ripe for disaster, a scenario where inexperience could have devastating consequences.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience heading a terror prevention team begs the question: is this intentional? Are they setting him up to fail? The optics are undeniably bad. This isn’t just about lacking the necessary skills and knowledge; it’s about the immense responsibility entrusted to someone who, frankly, hasn’t had the time to develop the necessary judgment and critical thinking skills. It feels like he’s being groomed to be the scapegoat for something illegal, or at least disastrous, down the line.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in this position makes you wonder if anyone has warned him that he’s potentially the fall guy. The political landscape is fraught with peril, and placing an inexperienced individual in the crosshairs like this seems not only irresponsible but also potentially malicious. When something goes wrong, and statistically, something eventually will, he will be the first one blamed, regardless of the actual cause. The speed and ferocity with which he could be made a patsy are frightening to contemplate.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in this role is a stark contrast to the outrage that often surfaces when a woman or minority is appointed to a position, even with appropriate qualifications. Where are the cries of “diversity hire” now? This situation highlights a disturbing double standard where perceived privilege trumps actual competence. The absence of the usual chorus of criticism speaks volumes about the biases that continue to permeate the system.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in such a role feels particularly unsettling given the current global climate. At a time when international tensions are high and the threat of terrorism remains a serious concern, entrusting national security to someone so unprepared is a gamble with potentially catastrophic consequences. The decision seems all the more reckless when considering ongoing conflicts and the potential for retaliatory actions. It feels like starting a conflict with a regime that is known to fund baddies around the world.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in this position underscores the feeling that the clowns are running the circus. This isn’t about partisanship; it’s about basic competence and the need for qualified individuals in positions of power, especially when national security is at stake. It’s a symptom of a larger problem – a pervasive disregard for expertise and a willingness to prioritize loyalty over qualifications.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience at the head of a terror prevention team makes one consider whether this is intentionally designed to fail. It is hard not to be concerned about the safety of our nation. This isn’t just a political blunder; it’s a potential security risk that could have devastating consequences. It’s a scenario that invites nightmares and fuels anxieties about the future.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience leading a government terror prevention team, along with the eyebrow raising photo he took, just makes the whole thing a joke. It feels like the next terror attack is around the corner. The idea of getting on an airplane just keeps getting scarier.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in this situation means that Americans voted for this. Whether it was indirectly or directly, We have to live with this for the next 3.5 years! The scariest part is that this doesn’t seem to be the exception, but the norm.
A 22-year-old college grad with no security experience in this role makes one long for the days of qualified individuals leading our security apparatus. At least he will be the scapegoat and maybe others will be held accountable as well.