By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Since May 2022, Chinese government-linked hackers have repeatedly targeted Russian companies and government agencies, seeking classified information and military secrets, despite public pronouncements of a strengthened Sino-Russian partnership and pledges against cyberattacks. These attacks, including operations impersonating Russian entities and targeting Rostec, suggest a Chinese effort to gain intelligence on Russia’s military activities and technological advancements. While the success of these operations remains unclear due to a likely lack of Kremlin comment, a recent FSB document reveals a growing internal Russian assessment of China as a significant security threat. This underscores a hidden tension beneath the surface of the publicly displayed friendship between the two nations.
Read the original article here
The New York Times’ report alleging that Chinese hackers have repeatedly targeted Russia since 2022 to steal military secrets is a fascinating development. It paints a picture of a complex geopolitical landscape where even close allies are not immune to espionage. The sheer audacity of such actions, even within the context of a supposedly “limitless friendship,” is striking. It raises the question of whether trust, even between nations perceived as close partners, truly exists, or if it’s merely a facade masking intense competition and strategic maneuvering.
The motivations behind these alleged hacking attempts are multi-faceted. One possibility is a simple desire to assess the capabilities of the Russian military. This isn’t necessarily about malice; it could be about gathering intelligence to inform China’s own military strategies, particularly given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This would be akin to a thorough examination of a competitor’s product line – examining strengths and weaknesses to inform one’s own development.
The surprising revelation, however, is the potential lack of significant returns on this investment of resources. Some suggest that the quality of Russian military secrets may be overestimated; that the data gleaned may not be particularly valuable due to issues like corruption and outdated technology. The disappointment expressed by some over the supposed lack of high-value intelligence certainly lends weight to this perspective. It highlights that even powerful nations can misjudge the value of their own – or their rivals’ – military capabilities.
This situation also underscores the pervasive nature of cyber espionage in the modern world. It’s hardly surprising that all major global powers engage in such activities; in fact, it might be naive to believe otherwise. The scale and sophistication of these operations, however, are likely to vary considerably, and the sheer scale of the efforts deployed by China against Russia points toward a level of ambition that warrants serious attention. The implication is that it’s not just a matter of acquiring military secrets, but of gaining a holistic understanding of the capabilities and vulnerabilities of a potential rival.
The idea that the Russian military is rife with corruption and its performance in Ukraine has been far less than impressive, adds another layer to this story. This perceived weakness casts doubt on the value of any secrets they might possess. However, even in a scenario where Russian technology is outdated or unreliable, the Chinese could still gain valuable insights from the organization, strategies, and operational failures of the Russian military. Even seemingly minor details can be useful for strategic planning. One could argue that the act of hacking itself, regardless of the quality of data obtained, sends a message.
Furthermore, the alleged hacking attempts might be a strategic move, a way for China to gauge Russia’s cybersecurity defenses. Knowing the weaknesses of a potential adversary is, in its own way, as valuable as knowing their strengths. This is especially true in the context of an ever-evolving geopolitical landscape, where alliances can shift and rivalries can intensify rapidly. The insights gained from analyzing the Russian response to these hacking attempts could be more valuable than the military secrets themselves.
The ongoing war in Ukraine is an undeniable factor influencing this situation. With Russia facing significant challenges and its allies becoming increasingly unreliable, China might be reassessing its relationship with Russia and exploring all potential avenues to understand the impact of the conflict and how it might shape the future geopolitical landscape. This emphasizes the dynamic and volatile nature of international relations and the ever-present competition for power and influence.
This situation illustrates the complexities of international relations and highlights the importance of carefully considering all possible motivations and objectives when analyzing geopolitical events. The alleged Chinese hacking of Russian military systems is more than just a simple case of espionage; it’s a reflection of the multifaceted and evolving power dynamics in the modern world, where even the closest of allies are not immune to the pressures of strategic competition. The long-term implications of this situation and the extent to which it might impact the future relationship between China and Russia remain to be seen, but one thing is certain: the world of international relations is constantly shifting and evolving.