By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The anti-woke movement, once portraying itself as oppressed truth-tellers fighting “cancel culture,” now holds significant power, ironically engaging in the very tactics they condemned. This hypocrisy is causing an internal identity crisis within some anti-woke circles, as evidenced by their actions against individuals and groups expressing dissenting views. Examples include the firing of PBS employees and the creation of deportation lists targeting pro-Palestinian activists. This trend threatens to expand, potentially silencing pro-choice advocates and others deemed “anti-Christian,” highlighting a concerning shift towards widespread censorship.
Read the original article here
The anti-woke warriors used to defend free speech, or so they claimed. Their pronouncements about freedom of expression always seemed suspiciously selective, conveniently omitting any mention of protecting the speech of those they disagreed with. It now seems abundantly clear that their supposed commitment to free speech was a calculated tactic, a shield to deflect criticism from their own often hateful and divisive rhetoric.
The anti-woke warriors’ concern for free speech wasn’t about upholding a principle; it was about ensuring their own right to express views without facing consequences. Their outrage wasn’t sparked by genuine censorship, but rather by the pushback against their use of slurs, racist remarks, and other forms of harmful speech. They viewed criticism as an attack on their freedom, conveniently ignoring the impact their words had on others.
The current actions of these anti-woke warriors, however, reveal the hollowness of their previous claims. Their behavior now actively resembles, and in many ways surpasses, the excesses of McCarthyism. They’re not just engaging in disagreement; they’re actively targeting and attempting to silence those who hold different views, often using smear campaigns and baseless accusations. This goes far beyond robust debate and crosses the line into outright suppression of dissent.
Consider the example of attempts to cancel children’s entertainers for inclusive practices or for expressing solidarity with marginalized groups. These are not actions consistent with a genuine commitment to open discourse. They demonstrate a ruthless pursuit of ideological conformity and a chilling intolerance for opposing viewpoints. Instead of fostering a marketplace of ideas, these anti-woke warriors are constructing a monolithic echo chamber.
The hypocrisy is glaring. Those who once decried “cancel culture” are now actively engaged in it, wielding their power to target and destroy the careers of those who challenge their narrative. Their claims of defending free speech were never about protecting the freedom of expression for all; it was always a self-serving justification for their own actions.
The media’s hesitant coverage of this shift is troubling. The tendency to present both sides of the issue, even when one side is clearly employing tactics of censorship and intimidation, obscures the reality of the situation. It’s time for a more direct and critical assessment of this blatant hypocrisy. The selective application of free speech principles, the targeting of specific individuals, and the overall pattern of behavior clearly indicates a deliberate suppression of dissenting voices.
Furthermore, the convenient amnesia surrounding their past pronouncements on free speech is alarming. They seemingly expect everyone to forget their previous rhetoric, while simultaneously condemning those who challenge their current actions. This blatant disregard for consistency exposes the disingenuous nature of their entire approach.
The irony is profound: a movement that once invoked free speech as its shield now embodies the very antithesis of that principle. They’ve transformed from purported defenders of free expression into active agents of censorship and intimidation. Their current actions make even the excesses of McCarthyism seem comparatively moderate by comparison. The question isn’t merely about hypocrisy; it’s about the erosion of fundamental democratic values.
The scale of their current actions is alarming. We are not simply witnessing a political disagreement, but an active campaign to suppress dissenting voices through intimidation, disinformation and the deliberate manipulation of public sentiment. The damage they’re inflicting on the discourse, and on society as a whole, will likely be felt for years to come.
In conclusion, the claim that the anti-woke warriors ever genuinely defended free speech rings hollow. Their actions then and now demonstrate a consistent pattern of using the rhetoric of freedom as a weapon to silence and attack those they oppose. This is not a defense of free speech; it is its antithesis. The implications of this are far-reaching and deserve urgent attention. The current situation necessitates a strong defense of actual free speech and tolerance—a principle these so-called defenders have so thoroughly betrayed.