By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ernst Fraenkel’s *The Dual State*, written in secret and published in 1941, details the Nazi regime’s creation of a “prerogative state” operating alongside the existing legal system (“normative state”). This parallel system enabled the Nazis to maintain a semblance of normalcy while simultaneously enacting violence and lawlessness against their perceived enemies. Fraenkel’s firsthand experience as a Jewish lawyer in Nazi Germany informed his analysis, demonstrating how the dictatorship didn’t abolish existing laws but rather used them selectively while establishing a lawless zone for targeted oppression. This model, applicable beyond the Nazi regime, highlights the insidious nature of dual states and their potential for escalating repression.
Read the original article here
America Is Watching the Rise of a Dual State
America is grappling with the unsettling possibility of a dual state, a system eerily reminiscent of historical dictatorships. This isn’t a complete overthrow of the established legal framework, but rather a subtle, insidious erosion of its power, creating a parallel system of lawlessness operating alongside the existing normative state.
This parallel system, a “prerogative state,” operates outside the bounds of established laws and procedures. It’s characterized by arbitrary actions, unchecked violence, and a disregard for due process, where the whims of those in power supersede legal guarantees. This isn’t a sudden revolution, but a gradual shift, a creeping encroachment of unchecked authority.
The impact of this dual state is not uniformly felt. For many, daily life continues as usual; the courts function, businesses operate, and everyday laws are enforced. But for others, those deemed enemies or threats to the current power structure, the prerogative state becomes a chilling reality, a zone where the law offers no protection.
This targeted suppression is the defining characteristic of the dual state. It’s the ability to selectively enforce or ignore the law based on political affiliation, perceived loyalty, or simply the whim of those in power. This creates a climate of fear and uncertainty, where the rights and freedoms of individuals are vulnerable to arbitrary actions.
The historical precedent of Nazi Germany provides a cautionary tale. Ernst Fraenkel’s “The Dual State” offers a compelling analysis of how the Nazi regime maintained a seemingly functional society while simultaneously establishing a parallel system of oppression. The Nazi’s maintained a capitalist economy and a functioning legal system for those who conformed, while simultaneously brutally suppressing opposition and enacting genocide.
The economic implications of this dual state are significant. The continuation of a functioning capitalist economy and stock market might seem to indicate stability, but this is only half the picture. The economic system may appear normal for those who benefit from it, but the long term damage from the erosion of legal and ethical constraints could have unforeseen consequences.
The potential for a fracturing of the United States is a worrisome development. The idea of a nation dividing into smaller, more homogenous entities, similar to the European Union, isn’t necessarily a solution. Such a division might exacerbate existing inequalities, leaving some regions economically and politically vulnerable. Moreover, the creation of smaller, potentially less democratic states could actually empower extremist ideologies.
The call for nonviolent resistance is crucial. History shows that violent opposition often leads to prolonged conflict, potentially resulting in a stalemate or a prolonged civil war. A strategy focused on non-violent means of resistance, utilizing tools such as civil disobedience and strategic non-cooperation, may be far more effective in the long run.
The situation is dire, but not hopeless. The current path presents a serious threat, but a unified citizenry, informed and committed to the principles of justice and democracy, can resist this erosion of the rule of law. Awareness of the historical parallels, the ability to identify the tactics of the prerogative state, and a determined commitment to democratic principles are critical to navigating this perilous time.
The American experiment is at a crossroads. The rise of a dual state is not merely a hypothetical threat; it’s a present reality that demands attention and decisive action. The challenge lies not just in recognizing this dual state, but in actively working to dismantle the forces that sustain it, ensuring that the rule of law prevails over arbitrary power, and that the promise of justice and equality for all is not lost. The future depends on it.