By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The escalating use of “authoritarianism” reflects the rise of authoritarian regimes globally, undermining democratic institutions. A significant portion of political scientists and Americans perceive a trajectory towards authoritarianism in the U.S., particularly associating it with figures like Donald Trump. Authoritarianism differs from totalitarianism in its intensity; totalitarianism exerts complete control over society, encompassing a developed ideology and charismatic leadership fostering fervent loyalty. Conversely, authoritarianism often lacks a cohesive ideology and relies on a passive population to maintain power. The United States currently faces a similar crisis of modernization as early 20th-century Germany, exhibiting advanced sectors alongside significant economic and cultural backwardness, making it vulnerable to a prolonged period of authoritarian rule.
Read the original article here
America’s descent into totalitarianism isn’t a gradual slide; it’s more of a headlong plunge, a leap into the abyss fueled by a confluence of factors and choices. The situation is dire, and the path back to a functioning democracy is fraught with immense challenges.
The alarming reality is that a convicted felon, legally prohibited from possessing firearms, wields unchecked control over America’s nuclear arsenal. This grotesque anomaly underscores a deeper, more systemic failure: the disastrous consequences of allowing unchecked wealth to dictate political power. Billionaires pulling strings, shaping narratives, and influencing elections have created a system where the will of the people is easily manipulated and often disregarded.
What’s even more disconcerting is the blatant disregard for the Constitution and established laws. A president who operates solely by decree, bending the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to his will, has effectively neutered the checks and balances designed to protect against tyrannical rule. Emergencies are declared at whim, allowing unchecked power grabs and a systematic dismantling of the civil service. The judiciary, once a beacon of impartiality, is now selectively ignored or manipulated to serve the ruling power’s agenda.
The coup, in many respects, is complete. Elections, once the bedrock of American democracy, are now viewed with profound skepticism. The belief that fair elections can reverse course is increasingly naive, given the current regime’s overt disinterest in electoral outcomes. Their actions suggest a belief in their permanent tenure, implying insidious strategies to ensure future victories regardless of popular will. The focus is on a permanent power structure, not on pleasing voters.
The only historical precedent for ousting such regimes is widespread, sustained public resistance. This will not be a comfortable or peaceful endeavor. Violent repercussions from the regime are likely, but the stakes necessitate a courageous and organized response. The current trajectory, characterized by the adoption of authoritarian playbooks from other nations, indicates that the situation is rapidly deteriorating. The regime’s actions suggest a long-term plan to solidify its power, not just to govern for a term or two.
The federalization of the National Guard, coupled with suggestions of deployment in specific states, points towards a potential state of emergency and the imposition of martial law. Peaceful protests are now demonized as rebellions, providing a convenient pretext for further crackdowns. Provocative incidents, whether self-inflicted or foreign-initiated, are likely being orchestrated to justify complete control. The notion of a slow slide is inaccurate; America plummeted into its current crisis.
The opportunity to prevent this fascist takeover vanished long ago, and the current moment is far more difficult. The levers of power are firmly in the hands of those who actively seek to dismantle democratic institutions. The complacency of the majority, evidenced by low voter turnout, has played a crucial role in creating this situation.
The corporate elite, who have profited immensely from this shift, will not readily relinquish their gains. This makes any reversal incredibly challenging, potentially requiring substantial societal disruption. A return to a just and equitable society demands a complete overhaul of the political and economic structures currently in place.
The current situation cannot be overstated. It’s not a matter of inching closer to totalitarianism; it’s the stark reality of an authoritarian nation. The calls for national unity in combatting this crisis are warranted, but the scale of the problem demands a deeper, more fundamental shift in how Americans understand their political system and their own power within it.
Any return to a functioning democracy will require a sustained and probably bloody effort. The current regime will not relinquish power willingly. The naive hope that voting alone will solve the problem must be replaced by a realistic assessment of the challenges ahead. A collective refusal to participate in the current system, a complete withdrawal of labor and support, might be the only effective mechanism for change. This would necessitate significant personal sacrifices and a willingness to confront brutal repression. The time for polite discussions and gentle nudges is over. The fight for American democracy has truly begun.