By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Over 700 Marines have been mobilized to Los Angeles, joining approximately 1,700 National Guard members already deployed. This deployment, ordered by President Trump without the consent of state or city officials, significantly escalates the military presence at the protests. The Marines’ specific role remains unclear, though they are expected to augment the National Guard and are prohibited from law enforcement unless the Insurrection Act is invoked. The action is unprecedented, with Governor Newsom calling it “unwarranted,” while the Marines’ deployment is described as supporting federal personnel and property.
Read the original article here
About 500 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California have been mobilized in response to protests in Los Angeles. This mobilization, according to reports, adds to the thousands of National Guard troops already activated. The deployment of these Marines is raising significant concerns, particularly given that it happened without the consent of California’s governor or Los Angeles’ mayor.
This action is seen by many as an unnecessary escalation of the situation. It’s a move that feels unprecedented, pushing boundaries and potentially setting dangerous precedents. The deployment is described by some as illegal and a clear overreach of authority. The legality and the necessity of such a large-scale military response to what are, comparatively, relatively small-scale protests are being heavily questioned.
The timing of the deployment also raises eyebrows. Protests, while initially large, have reportedly subsided considerably by the time the Marines arrive, leading some to believe the deployment is meant to be provocative rather than responsive. This suggests a deliberate attempt to escalate the situation, potentially even to incite further unrest. The suspicion is that this deployment could be a calculated move to justify further actions, possibly leading to a wider crackdown on dissent.
Concerns have been raised that the administration’s actions are inflammatory. The presence of a large military force in a civilian setting, especially one that many believe is unnecessary, has the potential to significantly inflame the situation, turning peaceful demonstrations into confrontations. There are fears that this could create a cycle of escalation, with the military presence potentially triggering more aggressive responses from protesters.
The deployment has evoked historical parallels. Many are drawing comparisons to past events where military intervention in civilian protests had deeply troubling consequences, raising fears of a repeat of such tragedies. The very act of deploying the Marines against US citizens exercising their First Amendment rights is seen as a deeply troubling violation of core democratic principles. The lack of consent from local authorities further intensifies these concerns.
The political implications of this action are vast. While it may serve to reinforce the image of a “strong man” leader among a certain segment of the population, it risks alienating many others and further polarizing the country. It might also unintentionally provide a platform for the governor, who is now presented as an opponent unjustly targeted by the federal government.
There’s a strong sentiment that this situation is being deliberately manipulated to create a pretext for broader actions. The concern is that the ultimate goal may be to declare martial law or suspend elections, using the protests as a justification. There is a growing anxiety amongst those who believe such scenarios are a possibility.
Many are questioning the motives and the judgment behind such an aggressive response. The scale of the military deployment is viewed as disproportionate to the level of unrest, raising questions about whether a deliberate effort to provoke a violent response is underway. The belief is that the current situation is being manipulated and fueled for a specific purpose, with the deployment acting as an amplifier.
This situation is sparking widespread outrage and calls for solidarity amongst those who are alarmed. Concerns are being raised not only about the immediate threat to protesters but also the implications for the future of democracy and the rule of law. There are calls for calm and a return to a de-escalatory approach, coupled with urgent demands for accountability. The deployment is being fiercely criticized as a betrayal of the military’s oath to protect the constitution and serve the American people. It’s described by some as a move towards a dangerously authoritarian posture.
Ultimately, the deployment of roughly 500 Marines in response to protests in Los Angeles remains a deeply controversial and concerning development, raising significant questions about the rule of law, the appropriate use of military force, and the future of civil liberties in the United States.