By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Fired National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s tenure ended after a photograph revealed his use of Signal, an unapproved messaging app, during his final cabinet meeting. The image showed ongoing communications with Vice President JD Vance and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, further highlighting security concerns. This incident follows a previous leak where Waltz mistakenly included a journalist in a sensitive group chat, contributing to his short 101-day term. Despite White House Communications Director Steven Cheung’s defense of Signal’s use, Waltz’s repeated lapses ultimately led to his dismissal and subsequent appointment as UN ambassador.
Read the original article here
Fired ‘Idiot’ Waltz Leaked One Last Signal Chat with Vance: A Confluence of Leaks and Concerns
The leaked Signal chat between Mike Waltz and JD Vance, following Waltz’s purported firing (or reassignment, depending on perspective) as a UN envoy, has ignited a firestorm of discussion and concern. This incident isn’t just another leak; it’s a symptom of a much larger issue, highlighting a seemingly deliberate pattern of avoiding official record-keeping and the use of unofficial communication channels within the current administration.
The sheer volume of leaks coming from within the administration is striking. Many wonder about the implications for record retention laws, given the apparent lack of official documentation for crucial decisions and actions. The current events feel like a series of revenge leaks, possibly stemming from internal conflicts and power plays, instead of accidental disclosures. The fact that names like Gabbard and Rubio appeared in the leaked screenshot further emphasizes the scale of this issue.
Waltz’s move to a UN envoy role, rather than an outright firing, adds another layer of complexity. While presented as a promotion, many see it as a strategic reassignment that might allow him to leverage his position to undermine the UN. The casual nature of this move raises serious questions about accountability and the true nature of his “dismissal.”
The repeated use of unofficial communication channels like Signal is deeply troubling. Three leaks might be a coincidence, but the pattern suggests a deliberate attempt to circumvent normal oversight and scrutiny. It’s highly disconcerting that high-ranking administration officials feel comfortable operating outside the established protocols, implying either a disregard for the law or the belief that they are above it. The comparison to 4chan’s supposed security highlights the administration’s apparent preference for opacity over transparency.
The content of the leaked communications themselves remains largely unknown, fueling speculation. The possibility of memes, GIFs, and other informal content adds another intriguing element to the situation. However, beyond the potential for humorous exchanges, the secrecy surrounding the communication itself is concerning. Such clandestine exchanges could conceal sensitive discussions, decisions, and potentially illegal activities.
The wider context of this situation goes beyond Waltz. Other figures like Hegseth are also mentioned, drawing attention to a broader problem of accountability and the implications for the administration’s actions. The concern is that if Waltz is merely a scapegoat, the next appointee may be even less competent or more prone to such behavior, perpetuating a cycle of instability and potentially harmful actions. The potential for worse actions from future appointees is alarming.
The whole situation appears to highlight a blatant disregard for traditional methods of communication and governance. There are questions about whether this pattern reflects a deliberate strategy to avoid accountability, a culture of carelessness, or both. The reliance on unofficial methods raises concerns about the security of sensitive information and the potential for future leaks.
This current administration is not alone in its history of avoiding official channels. A discussion about the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and efforts to minimize official record keeping is relevant here. There is a pattern of trying to hide things, and this is not new. A previously released undercover video showcasing the planning of a radical agenda, involving figures such as JD Vance, reinforces the concerns about transparency and the pursuit of an undisclosed political agenda.
The leaked Signal chat, coupled with the overall pattern of leaks and unofficial communication, is more than just an isolated incident. It’s a significant reflection of the current administration’s approach to governance and communication, raising serious concerns about accountability, transparency, and the potential for abuse of power. The long-term implications remain to be seen, but this seemingly small leak points to larger systemic problems. The focus should not just be on Waltz, but on the broader culture and practices within the administration that allow such situations to occur in the first place.