By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Tuesday, an F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jet crashed into the Red Sea after a failed landing attempt on the USS Harry S. Truman, marking the second such incident in eight days. Both pilots ejected safely with minor injuries after the aircraft’s tail hook failed to engage the arresting wire. This follows a previous incident where an F/A-18E Super Hornet and its tow tractor fell overboard on April 28th. Both incidents are currently under investigation.
Read the original article here
Another fighter jet has plunged into the Red Sea after failing to successfully land on the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier. This incident, the second in just eight days, raises serious questions about the operational readiness of the carrier and its air wing. While missing the arresting wires during a landing, often called a “bolter,” isn’t exceptionally uncommon, the fact that the aircraft simply fell overboard suggests a more significant problem than a routine landing mishap. The pilots ejected safely, thankfully only sustaining minor injuries, but the loss of another multi-million dollar aircraft is a significant setback.
The initial reports focused on the failed arrestment, but many suspect that a more complex issue may have occurred. Pilots typically apply full power immediately after missing the arresting wires, allowing them to climb and attempt another landing. Since this didn’t happen, something else – perhaps a mechanical failure or pilot error beyond a simple missed landing – contributed to the jet going overboard. The lack of a second attempt strongly suggests that a critical system malfunctioned, preventing a successful recovery.
This repeated loss of aircraft is not just a matter of damaged equipment. The cost is substantial, easily reaching $125 million for these two incidents alone. This financial burden underscores the need for a thorough investigation to uncover the underlying cause and prevent future occurrences. Some commenters have even cynically suggested that the loss of these planes might actually be a cost-saving measure for the government, eliminating the need for long-term maintenance and storage. Such speculation, however, belies the profound implications of repeated aircraft losses.
The fact that this occurred twice in such a short period on the same carrier warrants a high-level investigation. The captain and command staff are undoubtedly under immense pressure to find the root cause of these incidents. The potential repercussions could be considerable, even reaching the level of career-ending consequences for those found responsible. The loss of two jets highlights a more significant underlying problem than simple pilot error or mechanical malfunction. There could be systemic flaws in training, maintenance, or even in the decision-making processes onboard.
The carrier’s current deployment near Yemen, an area of ongoing conflict, might add further pressure. It is not unreasonable to consider the possibility of a compromised landing sequence caused by operational stress or external factors related to the mission. The loss of these jets adds a logistical challenge to ongoing operations, potentially impacting mission capability and putting additional pressure on the carrier’s remaining assets.
Beyond the financial ramifications and operational difficulties, the incidents raise important questions about the safety and readiness of the US Navy. The repeated nature of the incidents suggests a pattern that needs immediate attention. This is not just about replacing lost jets; it’s about addressing the fundamental issues that allowed this to happen twice in eight days. This raises concerns about the overall training and maintenance standards and demands a comprehensive review of protocols and procedures to ensure the safety of both personnel and equipment.
The ongoing investigation needs to focus not just on the immediate causes but also on the systemic issues that could have contributed to these incidents. Questions surrounding the maintenance records of the jets, pilot training and proficiency, and the overall operational environment must all be carefully reviewed. There is speculation about the exact nature of the events leading to both losses, with some suggesting the possibility of something more than a simple accident.
It is undeniable that the loss of these aircraft represents a significant setback for the US Navy. The financial cost is substantial but pales in comparison to the potential security implications. The ability of the US Navy to maintain operational readiness in crucial areas of conflict could be jeopardized by these setbacks. A thorough and transparent investigation is vital, not just to determine the causes but also to restore public confidence in the Navy’s operational effectiveness. The continued loss of fighter jets adds another layer of scrutiny to already existing concerns about military readiness and resource allocation. The incidents should serve as a wake-up call demanding immediate and decisive action to prevent further occurrences.