By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Civiqs polling data reveals President Trump’s approval rating is negative in both Florida and Texas, key states he won in 2024. While Republicans in both states largely approve of his performance, the negative trend, particularly since his “Liberation Day” tariffs, could negatively impact the GOP in the 2026 midterms. This decline is mirrored in several swing states, a worrying sign for Republicans according to political analysts. Trump himself has dismissed these polls as “fake news.”
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s approval rating is reportedly underwater in Florida and Texas, a development that’s generating considerable discussion. The numbers themselves, however, don’t seem drastically different from previous figures, often hovering around the 47-48% approval mark with disapproval slightly higher. This leads some to question whether the “underwater” label is truly representative of the situation.
The relatively small shifts in approval and disapproval percentages raise concerns about the accuracy and impact of such headlines. While a decline may be present, the degree of change appears marginal, suggesting the overall picture is far more nuanced.
Despite the seemingly modest decline, the persistent support for Trump remains a significant point of concern. Some observers express skepticism that even devastating events would shift the unwavering loyalty of some voters. This raises serious questions about the resilience of partisan divisions and the effectiveness of traditional political messaging.
The continued support, even with negative approval ratings, is attributed to various factors. One perspective highlights the deep-seated partisan loyalty that often overrides concerns about policy or leadership. It suggests that the Republican party’s identity is so closely intertwined with Trump that any disapproval is insufficient to sway their votes.
Another interpretation points to the perception of Democrats as an even less desirable alternative. The argument is that voters may dislike Trump but feel the Democratic Party offers even fewer appealing options, creating a sort of forced choice scenario. This perspective underscores the perceived limitations of the Democratic message and its struggle to connect with certain segments of the population.
Some even suggest that the negative news regarding Trump’s approval ratings might be strategically misleading, potentially an attempt to influence voter perception without fundamentally altering the reality on the ground. This leads to a broader debate about the reliability of polling data and the role of media narratives in shaping political reality.
The implications extend beyond the immediate political climate. The resilience of Trump’s support base, despite negative approval ratings, suggests a deep-rooted political realignment. This recalibration will have long-term effects on both political parties and the overall political landscape, regardless of any immediate shifts in opinion polls.
This political climate, even with “underwater” approval ratings, is not without its potential consequences for other Republicans. The influence of Trump’s agenda and the willingness of other Republican candidates to align themselves with his positions creates a ripple effect that extends beyond Trump’s own political standing.
Underlying much of the discussion is the perceived lack of accountability. There’s a sense that Trump, and by extension those who support him, are largely immune to the consequences of their actions or beliefs. This perceived impunity reinforces the narrative of a deeply divided electorate, where opposing viewpoints have become irreconcilable.
The conversation also reveals an underlying tension between how the data is presented and the actual significance of that data. While some might see an “underwater” approval rating as a significant blow to Trump’s standing, others argue that the relatively small percentage point change is not a significant indicator of genuine shifts in public opinion.
There’s a considerable amount of cynicism expressed about the possibility of meaningful change in the near future. Even those who acknowledge the seemingly negative polling data remain doubtful that it would translate into tangible political consequences. This sentiment emphasizes the ingrained polarization and the depth of the partisan divide.
Ultimately, the question of whether Donald Trump’s underwater approval ratings in Florida and Texas represent a meaningful shift in public opinion remains open to debate. While the numbers might suggest a decline, the persistent and unwavering support among a core segment of voters indicates a far more complex reality than simple approval/disapproval figures convey. The long-term implications of this enduring loyalty will undoubtedly continue to shape the political landscape.