By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s proposed “External Revenue Service” would replace income taxes with tariffs, theoretically funding the government through levies on imported goods. This plan aims to eliminate income taxes for those earning under $200,000 annually. The idea draws historical parallels to the pre-income-tax era when tariffs were a primary government revenue source. Trump projects this shift as a significant financial boon for American citizens.
Read the original article here
Trump faces a trillion-dollar tariff disappointment. The initial expectation of massive revenue generation from border levies is proving wildly inaccurate. The reality is, the restrictively high tariffs implemented have had a predictable and detrimental effect on the economy. A consumer-based economy simply cannot function when consumers lack the purchasing power to sustain consumption. This should have been obvious from the outset, yet it seems only a select group initially applauded the policy.
The tariffs are proving disastrous because they significantly increase the prices of imported goods. This price hike isn’t absorbed by foreign producers, as some had predicted, but rather passed on to American consumers in the form of higher prices at the retail level. This means American consumers, not the intended targets, are effectively paying the tariffs. This fundamental economic principle seems to have been overlooked.
The administration’s attempt to coerce car manufacturers and major retailers like Walmart to absorb the costs rather than pass them along further highlights the flawed strategy. These actions underscore a misunderstanding of basic market dynamics and the inherent limitations of such protectionist policies. This is because the demand for goods is inherently elastic; when prices rise sharply, consumers naturally reduce their purchasing. Who would pay 140 percent more for an item?
The predictable consequence is a reduction in the volume of imports. Fewer imports translate directly into less revenue collected through the tariffs. This simple relationship, easily understood by most economists, appears to have eluded the policy’s architects. The expectation of a trillion-dollar windfall from tariffs was based on a flawed assumption of consistent import volume, regardless of the massive price increase. This oversight, unfortunately, had far-reaching consequences.
What’s more, the attempt to frame this shortfall as somehow Biden’s fault demonstrates a total disregard for reality. The seeds of this economic failure were sown long before the current administration took office. The negative consequences continue to ripple through the economy, impacting consumers and businesses alike. The projected revenue shortfall is not just a matter of slightly lower-than-expected figures; it’s a complete miscalculation of the fundamental principles of supply and demand.
The administration’s response to the evident failure is equally concerning. Instead of acknowledging the flaws in the tariff strategy, there’s likely to be a pattern of denial, blame-shifting, and manipulation of data. Expect pronouncements of fake news, inflated figures, and attempts to deflect responsibility. These tactics are unlikely to address the core issue: a fundamental misunderstanding of economics.
The situation is far graver than a simple revenue shortfall; it points to a dangerous disregard for economic realities. The misguided belief that higher prices would not affect purchasing power has led to a situation where the American consumer is directly bearing the brunt of a policy designed to protect American businesses. But the tariffs aren’t doing so in a way that’s benefiting the economy at large; rather, they’re causing significant financial pain for many Americans while lining the pockets of large corporations.
The broader implication is even more concerning. A potential economic downturn, fueled by diminished consumer spending and increased prices, is a likely outcome. The global implications are also substantial, with the possibility of strained international relations resulting from protectionist trade policies. The long-term consequences of this trillion-dollar miscalculation are likely to be profound and far-reaching. The initial optimism surrounding the potential for substantial revenue from tariffs has quickly given way to a stark realization of the policy’s disastrous failure.