By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s tariffs, despite administration claims to the contrary, are increasing consumer prices on various goods, as admitted by Walmart CEO Doug McMillon. This admission prompted Trump’s public criticism and pressure on Walmart to reverse course. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that Walmart will absorb some tariff costs, but some will be passed to consumers. Republican dissent is growing, with figures like Mike Pence and Rand Paul highlighting the tariffs as a significant tax increase imposed without Congressional approval.
Read the original article here
Trump’s furious reaction to Walmart’s price increase announcement, directly resulting from his tariffs, highlights a stunning disconnect. His anger isn’t at the consequences of his policy, but at the fact that those consequences are precisely what economic experts predicted. The situation underscores a pattern of ignoring expert advice and shifting blame, tactics that have become hallmarks of his presidency.
This latest episode demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of basic economics. The whole point of tariffs is to increase the price of imported goods, making domestically produced goods comparatively more attractive. Walmart’s decision to raise prices is not a failure of the tariffs; it’s their intended effect. It’s as if someone designed a machine to produce heat and then got angry when it produced heat.
The sheer audacity of blaming Walmart, after already shifting blame to American consumers for wanting too many “dolls,” is breathtaking. This pattern of deflecting responsibility reveals a profound unwillingness to acknowledge mistakes, a trait repeatedly observed throughout his career, from his bankrupt casinos to his claims about the 2020 election. His casinos’ failures – not just one, but multiple – stand as stark reminders of his business acumen, or rather, lack thereof.
It’s almost comical that someone who bankrupted a casino, a business built on taking money from customers, would be surprised when his policies lead to increased costs for consumers. The casino model, by its very nature, revolves around extracting value from patrons willingly participating in the process. Trump’s failure to grasp such a simple concept underscores his profound detachment from economic reality.
Furthermore, the notion that his tariffs aren’t a tax on American consumers, but somehow a tax on China or other foreign countries, is utterly illogical. The reality is that tariffs increase the price of imported goods for American consumers, no matter how one tries to spin it. American businesses, like Walmart, absorbing the increased cost would only temporarily delay the inevitable price hike for consumers.
The president’s response to this predictable outcome also displays a consistent pattern of scapegoating. His “eat the cost” directive to Walmart demonstrates a complete disregard for the implications of his own policies. It also illustrates a lack of understanding of how businesses operate and how costs eventually filter down to the consumer. Small businesses, in particular, could be severely impacted by such a policy, perhaps even pushed out of business entirely.
The ensuing “Trumpian meltdown,” as it’s become commonly called, is not just a temper tantrum; it’s a manifestation of profound denial and cognitive dissonance. Instead of acknowledging the validity of the predictions made by economists, he doubles down, deflects responsibility, and searches for someone else to blame.
This refusal to accept responsibility extends beyond mere economic policy. It is a pattern observed consistently across various aspects of his presidency. Whether the issue is the handling of a pandemic or an election result, the consistent response involves obfuscation, denial, and the shifting of blame.
The broader context of this situation is equally alarming. Millions of Americans voted for a candidate who routinely disregards expert advice and demonstrably flawed business practices, demonstrating a worrying level of political and economic illiteracy within the electorate. The events surrounding Walmart’s price increase serve as a cautionary tale, highlighting the dangers of electing a leader who prioritizes personal gain and self-preservation over rational policy and the well-being of the nation.
The reality is stark: the economic consequences of Trump’s tariffs are precisely as economists predicted. His angry reaction reveals not a shrewd political strategy, but a deep-seated inability to accept responsibility and an alarming lack of understanding of basic economic principles. The consequences of this leadership style, as evidenced by the rising prices at Walmart, are far-reaching and deeply concerning for the future of the American economy. The current trajectory reflects a dangerous combination of willful ignorance and a disregard for the expert opinions needed for sound economic policy.