By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Prior to his inauguration, President Trump threatened South Africa with 100% tariffs if it pursued a new currency to challenge the dollar, a plan South Africa denied. Subsequently, the Trump administration cut aid to South Africa, expelled its ambassador, and then, during a White House meeting, falsely accused South Africa of committing genocide against white farmers, showing fabricated evidence. South African President Ramaphosa refuted these claims, highlighting the country’s high crime rate and seeking assistance from the US, a request Trump ignored. This incident exposed Trump’s deep-seated racism and disregard for truth, fueled by his advisor Elon Musk and aligning with Trump’s broader anti-immigrant and anti-diversity stances.
Read the original article here
Trump’s meeting with Ramaphosa underscores a reality that should have been apparent years ago: we can no longer afford to dismiss his racism. It’s not a recent revelation; it’s been a consistent and undeniable feature of his public persona, woven into the fabric of his political career. To claim otherwise is to ignore a mountain of evidence, from his decades-long history of discriminatory statements and actions to the very core of his political appeals.
The blatant disregard for the gravity of his racism is truly astonishing. How could anyone have possibly overlooked the overt racism that has defined his political career, from the Central Park Five case to his inflammatory rhetoric targeting immigrants and minorities? This isn’t a subtle matter; it’s a gaping chasm of prejudice that has been on full display for years.
The notion that his racism was somehow acceptable until now is profoundly troubling. It suggests a tolerance for bigoted behavior that is unacceptable in any context, let alone the highest office in the land. The fact that this is even a discussion point highlights a deeply ingrained problem within American society – a problem that has allowed a demonstrably racist individual to gain and retain such significant political power.
It’s not just about isolated incidents; it’s about a pattern of behavior reflecting deeply entrenched beliefs. The casual racism, the coded language, the dog whistles – all of these add up to a picture of a man whose worldview is irrevocably tainted by prejudice. To minimize this as simply “basic racism” is to fundamentally misunderstand its pervasive and corrosive nature. It’s far more than casual bigotry; it’s a calculated strategy that has fueled his ascent to power.
The claim that this is some newfound discovery is patently false. Millions have witnessed his racism for years, understanding it as a defining characteristic of his brand of politics. For many, it wasn’t a question of dismissing the racism, but rather, of accepting it as an integral part of the political landscape they inhabit. To those who chose to overlook it, the meeting with Ramaphosa serves as a stark reminder of what they were ignoring.
The attempt to shift blame onto “Trump supporters” as the sole perpetrators of this willful ignorance is overly simplistic. The responsibility for this failure to adequately address Trump’s racism lies far beyond a single voting bloc. It rests with the media outlets that normalized his rhetoric, the political figures who enabled his rise, and the citizens who failed to speak out against this dangerous trend.
It’s time for a reckoning. A serious reckoning that acknowledges the pervasive racism within American society that allowed Trump’s career to flourish. This is not merely a matter of partisan politics; it’s a question of moral integrity and a deep-seated societal illness that must be addressed head-on.
The nonchalant acceptance of Trump’s racism, even by those who might otherwise disapprove of his policies, represents a profound failure of collective accountability. The ease with which his racism was overlooked – or worse, celebrated by some – should be a wake-up call to everyone who values a just and equitable society.
The encounter with Ramaphosa, with its inherent visual representation of power dynamics, serves as a potent reminder of the consequences of this prolonged silence. The image itself serves as a testament to the failure to confront the very real racism that underpins so much of American politics. To pretend that we only now recognize the extent of Trump’s racism is to absolve ourselves of our collective complicity in allowing it to flourish for so long.
The implications reach far beyond the immediate context of the meeting. Trump’s racist rhetoric has rippled outwards, impacting national and international relations. The normalization of this kind of bigotry has created a dangerous precedent and has made it much harder to combat racism on a global scale.
The question we must now ask ourselves is not how to dismiss it anymore, but how to actively dismantle the systems that enable and perpetuate such blatant racism. We can start by acknowledging that Trump’s racism was never hidden and that those who failed to address it were equally complicit. The conversation must move beyond mere acknowledgment towards meaningful action and systemic change. Only then can we truly hope to heal the divisions that have festered for far too long.