By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite President Trump’s claims, a finalized agreement for transferring Qatar’s Boeing 747-8 to the U.S. Air Force remains elusive due to ongoing legal negotiations. Qatar seeks clarifications ensuring the transfer is explicitly attributed to the Trump administration and absolving them of future ownership responsibilities. This delay stems from concerns surrounding legal liability associated with the administration’s recharacterization of the transaction from a sale to a “gift.” While the deal is not expected to collapse, the ongoing clarifications will likely invite further scrutiny of the administration’s account of the deal’s origins. The transfer, once completed, will require extensive retrofitting at a significant cost.
Read the original article here
Trump’s assertion that Qatar gifted him a luxury jet to replace Air Force One is far from straightforward, despite official US claims. The narrative suggests the Trump administration, not Qatar, initiated contact this past winter to purchase a plane, stemming from the President’s frustration over delays in the $3.9 billion Boeing order for two new jets. This initial attempt at a sale morphed into Qatar supposedly providing the plane as a gift, a claim that appears remarkably convenient.
The notion of a simple “gift” is highly dubious. The significant difference between a gift and a negotiated deal raises serious questions about Qatar’s motives. What are they receiving in return for this generous “gift”? This situation echoes past deals under the Trump administration, many of which ultimately never materialized, like the infamous Foxconn deal in Wisconsin. This raises concerns about transparency and accountability.
The current situation involving a third Air Force One, this 747 from Qatar, adds another layer of complexity. Converting this plane would cost approximately $1 billion and take roughly three years, potentially causing further delays to the already delayed Boeing project. Should Boeing halt work on the original two planes, or juggle three simultaneous projects? The economic sense of this action is unclear. There’s nothing particularly unique about this 747 that warrants such an elaborate process; it’ll require extensive modifications to become Air Force One regardless of its current condition.
The absurdity of this situation is compounded by the United States’ substantial defense budget ($800 billion). Acquiring a standard civilian 747 hardly seems like an insurmountable obstacle given the resources available. This raises concerns about the administration’s decision-making process and its capacity for honesty. Whether a “gift” or a purchase, the potential cost is still alarming. Even assuming a $400 million “gift,” the additional $400 million in refurbishment costs, plus the considerable construction time and limited operational lifespan before retirement, represent an extravagant waste of taxpayer money.
The idea of converting the plane into a troop transport would be a more practical and efficient use of resources, providing a significant upgrade to troop transport capabilities instead of adding to the fleet of presidential aircraft. Claims that the plane is intended for a future Trump presidential library further heighten skepticism. Why not use one of the retired planes for this purpose, following the precedent set by President Reagan? The entire narrative suggests a disregard for transparency and accountability.
The contradictory accounts surrounding this deal— initially presented as a gift then implied as a purchase — along with inconsistencies regarding other gifts, highlight the lack of honesty and transparency. The timeline of events, from initial contact to the final agreement (which isn’t even fully finalized), leaves considerable room for doubt. This entire episode suggests an attempt to circumvent normal procurement processes and potentially skirt legal or ethical concerns. The whole affair reeks of a backroom deal, lacking transparency and seemingly motivated by personal interests rather than the national interest.
The potential for Qatar to gain intelligence through the plane raises national security issues. This is in addition to concerns regarding potential quid pro quo arrangements connected to Trump’s extensive business ventures, such as the proposed $5.5 billion golf course project in Qatar. This deal smells of desperation, not only to acquire a plane but also to secure personal gain. The President’s apparent lack of understanding of the complexities involved in creating an Air Force One, alongside his reported preference for an aesthetically pleasing aircraft over a secure and functional one, paints a picture of impulsive decision-making and a disregard for established procedures. This entire episode serves as a testament to the outlandish nature of current political reality, leaving one to wonder about the competence and honesty of those in power. The situation underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in government dealings.