By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During his first 100 days, President Trump actively dismantled various aspects of American society, including government institutions, civil rights, and international alliances. This was a deliberate effort to overturn the advancements of the 20th century, a period marked by increased equality, wealth, and global influence. Trump’s actions, echoing the views of paleolibertarian thinkers, aim to create a less equal, less educated, and more insular nation. This includes attacks on higher education, civil rights legislation, and even the 14th Amendment, all while enacting economically destructive tariffs. The result is a deeply unpopular president presiding over a rapidly unraveling nation.
Read the original article here
Trump’s first 100 days weren’t just a chaotic spectacle; they felt like a deliberate dismantling of established norms and institutions. The sheer scale of the grift, the enriching of himself and his cronies, surpassed anything seen before in American history. It wasn’t just incompetence; it looked like a calculated coup, a slow-motion takeover disguised as a presidency.
The brazen disregard for established processes and norms was shocking. The constant barrage of erratic decisions and inflammatory rhetoric served to destabilize the country and deepen existing societal divisions. It was as if the goal was to create chaos, to sow discord, and to weaken the fabric of American society.
The sycophantic praise from cabinet members during that 100-day mark was chilling. Their statements weren’t merely endorsements; they were affirmations of a destructive agenda. Their words painted a picture of a deliberate effort to reshape the country, not through thoughtful policy, but through a radical upheaval of the status quo.
The cabinet’s celebratory tone masked a grim reality. Their descriptions of “peace deals,” “trade deals,” and “tax deals” suggested a vision of a drastically altered America, one shaped not by consensus or compromise but by the whims of a single individual and his powerful allies. The constant emphasis on how these actions surpassed those of any other administration only served to highlight the radical nature of this transformation.
The claims of a “recruiting renaissance” in the military felt ominous. The implication that the military’s newfound strength was tied directly to Trump’s presence suggested the potential for a militarized, authoritarian state. This, combined with reports of strained relations with key global partners, pointed towards a foreign policy based on confrontation rather than diplomacy, further isolating the U.S. on the world stage.
The underlying goal seemed less about any coherent ideology and more about the accumulation of power and wealth. The comments about enriching himself, his family, and his supporters painted a picture of a presidency driven by self-interest, with the destruction of American institutions a mere byproduct of this pursuit. There’s a strong sense that this was about personal gain above all else, with the broader damage a regrettable but acceptable cost.
Some have argued that Trump is simply too incompetent to have a grand, destructive plan. However, the consistent pattern of actions, coupled with the support of those who clearly had an agenda, suggests a coordinated effort. Even if Trump lacked the foresight to fully comprehend the consequences, he became a tool for those who did.
The consequences of these first 100 days were far-reaching and devastating. The economic instability, the erosion of democratic norms, and the strained international relations all contributed to a climate of fear and uncertainty. The comments about the looming global recession and the potential for war were not hyperbole; they were warnings about the potential for catastrophic failure.
It’s not just about Trump; the complicity of the Republican party is equally disturbing. The lack of meaningful opposition, the unwillingness to challenge his actions, suggests a shared culpability in the unfolding disaster. The party’s silence became an endorsement, a tacit agreement to participate in the systematic dismantling of American democracy.
The situation was not inevitable. There were points where the trajectory could have been altered. However, the failure of Congress to act decisively, the unwillingness to hold Trump accountable, allowed the destructive process to continue. The ongoing damage suggests a pre-planned agenda, expertly executed by those with a vested interest in disrupting American society and seizing power. The first 100 days were merely the opening act of a far greater, more destructive drama.