Contrary to headlines, President Trump did not actually fire any Federal Trade Commission commissioners; he merely stated his desire to do so, a power he legally lacks. News coverage often misrepresents Trump’s actions, as exemplified by headlines employing mixed metaphors or accepting his economic claims at face value. Such reporting fails to address the underlying issue: Trump’s policies stem from his corruption and intellectual decline, not from any coherent plan. His erratic economic decisions, therefore, are best understood through the lens of his personal failings.
Read the original article here
Americans Really Dislike Trump. But They’re About to Truly Hate Him. Welcome to the summer of scarcity and the full-blown Trump recession.
Many have disliked Trump since 2016, but for those who haven’t, the coming months promise a rude awakening. Empty shelves and soaring prices are poised to define this summer, creating a perfect storm of economic hardship. This isn’t merely a downturn; this is shaping up to be a full-blown recession, directly attributable to past economic policies.
Trump, predictably, will deflect blame. He’ll pin the responsibility on Biden, on foreign trade partners, anyone but himself. And his most loyal supporters? They’ll believe him, further solidifying their unwavering faith in a narrative divorced from reality. This unwavering loyalty, however, will offer no protection from the impending economic fallout.
The summer season is crucial for many businesses. With a significant drop in consumer spending and a shortage of goods, businesses reliant on summer revenue will face severe challenges, potentially leading to closures and job losses. The potential for social unrest is palpable, particularly as those already struggling with access to necessities like medicine will face even greater hardship.
The coming economic hardship isn’t just about inconvenience; it’s about survival. For those already rationing essential medicines, the situation will only worsen. This recession is the direct consequence of prioritizing ideology over effective governance, and the resulting suffering will disproportionately impact those least equipped to withstand it. The anger and frustration born from this reality could easily escalate into something far more serious.
The current economic instability isn’t merely an accident; it’s the culmination of deliberate policies. Tariffs, for example, are not solely Trump’s legacy; they represent a broader Republican strategy, one that has had demonstrably negative economic consequences. Even now, the ability to reverse course remains, but political will is conspicuously absent.
A disturbing trend is the emergence of a “tough love” narrative from the conservative camp. This framing ignores the reality of the crisis and presents economic hardship as a deserved consequence, a misguided attempt to rationalize the suffering inflicted on the population. This unwavering ideology, coupled with the cult-like devotion to Trump, makes constructive dialogue virtually impossible.
The idea that there will be a sudden change of heart or a collective reckoning within the Republican base is unrealistic. The scapegoating of minorities and political opponents will intensify as the economic situation worsens. Any attempt to address the problem will be met with entrenched resistance, and the likelihood of meaningful change within the GOP is virtually nil. This means that the burden of addressing this self-inflicted crisis will fall squarely on the shoulders of those most vulnerable.
The upcoming economic difficulties extend beyond simple shortages. We’re likely to see price gouging on a massive scale, exacerbating the existing financial strain on consumers. The tourist industry will suffer, as will many other sectors. And yet, the narrative will remain firmly fixed on blaming external factors, rather than confronting the underlying cause of the problem.
The scale of the impending hardship should not be underestimated. Initial shortages will be just the beginning. The domino effect of business closures, job losses, and lack of a proper social safety net will lead to a level of privation uncommon in developed nations.
The current administration’s response, or lack thereof, suggests a calculated strategy of allowing the situation to escalate. This raises serious concerns about the potential use of martial law to suppress the resulting civil unrest. At that point, the loyalty and responsibility of the armed forces will be the only hope against a potential slide into authoritarianism. The coming months will be a test not only of the American economy but also of American democracy itself.
