By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration, facing delays in acquiring new Air Force One planes, initiated contact with Qatar to explore purchasing a Boeing 747. This contradicts Trump’s claim that Qatar offered the plane as a gift. The Pentagon initially contacted Boeing, who suggested Qatar as a potential seller, leading to discussions about leasing or purchasing the aircraft. Despite Trump’s characterization of the deal, legal teams from both countries are still negotiating the terms, and the transaction remains uncertain.
Read the original article here
The Trump administration’s pursuit of a new Air Force One replacement is a story that keeps unfolding, revealing layers of intrigue and questionable dealings. Initial reports suggest that the administration didn’t initially explore domestic options, like Boeing, for a new aircraft. Instead, the search for a replacement began overseas, with an outreach to Qatar regarding the acquisition of one of their jets.
This approach immediately raises eyebrows. Why bypass American manufacturers with the expertise and capacity to build presidential aircraft? The decision to pursue a foreign option appears unconventional and potentially problematic, given the logistical and security implications involved in converting a pre-owned aircraft for use as Air Force One. The process of transforming a standard jet into a heavily fortified, technologically advanced flying fortress would be extensive and expensive.
Furthermore, the choice of Qatar as the initial point of contact invites speculation. The timeline suggests that the administration approached Qatar about purchasing a plane before thoroughly evaluating other options or even exploring the feasibility of a new build with American manufacturers. It is noteworthy that the jet in question was apparently a decade-old plane that had previously proved difficult to sell.
The entire scenario begs the question: was this a legitimate attempt to acquire an aircraft, or something far more dubious? The fact that a plane already deemed difficult to sell was considered, raises questions about the priorities and motives behind this initiative. Considering the extensive modification required for presidential use, the overall project would be highly complex and time-consuming, potentially surpassing the Trump administration’s timeline.
This lack of transparency and the unusual foreign approach suggest a potential deeper motivation. The narrative quickly shifts from a simple aircraft acquisition to something more akin to a trade, or perhaps even a shakedown. The idea of a pre-existing relationship, or a quid pro quo arrangement with Qatar, cannot be entirely ruled out. The fact that the jet was described as being “nearby in Palm Beach” further fuels these suspicions. It hints at an element of convenience that seems too coincidental.
The potential for impropriety becomes increasingly apparent. Was this a thinly veiled attempt to solicit a bribe or favor? The act of actively seeking a foreign-owned aircraft, especially one difficult to sell, rather than working with American companies, opens the door to a wealth of ethical and legal questions. Was it an attempt to benefit personally, or was it for political gain?
The suggestion of a shakedown, whereby the administration leveraged its position to procure a plane with less regard for protocol, is plausible. The potential for leveraging this request for political or personal gain creates an image that is not only unethical but potentially illegal.
Adding to the mystery, there are conflicting accounts of who initiated the conversations, when, and what was promised or expected in return. The lack of clear information only deepens the suspicions surrounding this transaction. The whole situation remains shrouded in ambiguity, further clouding the administration’s true intentions.
Adding fuel to the fire are concerns about potential foreign influence. The acquisition of a foreign-made plane, even if ostensibly a purchase, raises questions about potential vulnerabilities in the nation’s security, especially considering the sensitive nature of the use of the aircraft for presidential travel. Did they consider this?
In conclusion, the initial approach to Qatar for a replacement Air Force One remains perplexing and raises serious questions about transparency and potential misconduct within the Trump administration. The lack of explanation and the apparent lack of due diligence casts a shadow of suspicion over the entire affair, leaving more questions than answers. The pursuit of this pathway, bypassing American manufacturers, suggests a story far more complex and potentially problematic than it might initially appear. The lack of verifiable evidence leaves the possibility for numerous interpretations, but the suspicion that this went beyond a simple aircraft acquisition is inescapable.