By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following negotiations between the Trump administration and Ovidio Guzmán López, a top Sinaloa Cartel member and son of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, nearly 20 of El Chapo’s family members were granted entry into the United States. This occurred after the family crossed the border with the apparent knowledge of U.S. agents. The Mexican government, unaware of the arrangement, has requested information from the Trump administration regarding this deal. The move comes amidst increased U.S. legal action against cartel leaders, including the first-ever use of “narcoterrorism” charges.
Read the original article here
The assertion that Trump struck a secret deal with El Chapo’s cartel, granting his family members access to the United States, is a shocking claim. The alleged deal, if true, would represent a significant breach of national security and a blatant disregard for US immigration laws. The fact that it allegedly caught the Mexican president off guard underscores the potential gravity of the situation and raises serious questions about the Trump administration’s foreign policy priorities.
This supposed arrangement appears to contradict the administration’s tough stance on illegal immigration and drug trafficking. It fuels concerns about potential collusion between high-ranking officials and dangerous criminal organizations. The implications are far-reaching and deeply troubling, especially considering the violent nature of the Sinaloa cartel and the devastating impact of their drug trade.
The alleged clandestine nature of the deal raises significant questions about transparency and accountability. If confirmed, this would represent a profound betrayal of public trust. Furthermore, the fact that this information, if true, isn’t more widely reported in conservative media outlets is curious, prompting speculation about potential cover-ups or deliberate suppression of the news.
The contrast between this alleged deal and the administration’s rhetoric on border security is stark. The apparent hypocrisy is striking, given the emphasis placed on building a wall and restricting immigration. This alleged secret deal would seem to undermine those very efforts and raise questions about whether the stated immigration policies were ever genuinely enforced or were simply a political tool.
The potential payoff for such a deal is a crucial aspect requiring investigation. How much, if any, did the Trump administration receive in return for this alleged favor? The lack of transparency surrounding this possibility is particularly disturbing, and an investigation is urgently needed.
This alleged agreement would appear to directly contradict Trump’s public statements about not negotiating with terrorists. The comparison between this deal and similar alleged dealings with the Taliban further underscores the inconsistency in his foreign policy approach. The implications for national security are profound, potentially weakening America’s resolve in combating international terrorism and transnational crime.
The reaction to the alleged deal has been mixed, ranging from outrage to skepticism. Some observers argue that the deal, if true, would be an impeachable offense. Others question the lack of concrete evidence, though the lack of reporting in certain outlets only raises further concern.
If this supposed deal was a quid pro quo arrangement, as many suspect, it would be an alarming indicator of the lengths to which some might go to protect themselves or gain an advantage. The supposed exchange of information for asylum, while raising questions about the morality of such a trade-off, is presented as having saved the family members’ lives.
However, even if this alleged justification is accurate, it does nothing to mitigate the betrayal of trust and potential security risks to the United States. The perception that high-level officials might engage in secretive deals with dangerous cartels is profoundly damaging to the nation’s standing, both domestically and internationally.
Furthermore, the alleged actions directly contradict the often expressed goal of deporting criminals. The apparent prioritization of El Chapo’s family members over other legal immigration cases would appear to be a complete reversal of stated policy and raises serious questions about fairness and equal application of the law. The disparity between the treatment of El Chapo’s family and other immigrants further highlights the perceived inconsistencies and contradictions within the administration’s immigration policies.
In conclusion, the allegations of a secret deal between the Trump administration and El Chapo’s cartel warrant a thorough, independent investigation. The potential consequences of such an arrangement are far-reaching and demand a full accounting of all relevant facts. The lack of transparency surrounding the alleged deal, coupled with the apparent contradiction to stated policies, raises serious concerns about the integrity and security implications. The silence from certain media outlets is a cause for further concern, underscoring the need for a rigorous investigation into this extraordinary claim.