By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Colonel General Andrei Mordvichev has been appointed the new commander of Russia’s ground forces, replacing General Oleg Salyukov. Mordvichev, known for his brutal, attritional combat tactics, oversaw the sieges of Mariupol and Avdiivka, resulting in significant Ukrainian casualties. His appointment, reported amidst ongoing peace talks, suggests the Kremlin’s endorsement of these tactics. Mordvichev’s close relationship with Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov further highlights his rise through the ranks.
Read the original article here
Russia reportedly has a new ground forces chief, Colonel General Andrei Mordvichev, replacing General Oleg Salyukov. This appointment has sparked considerable discussion, particularly given Mordvichev’s alleged role in some of the war’s most brutal assaults. His promotion suggests a potential shift in Russian military strategy, possibly leaning further into the controversial “meat grinder” tactics.
Mordvichev’s career has been marked by his involvement in intense battles. His command during the siege of Mariupol, a protracted and devastating conflict estimated to have resulted in thousands of casualties, is a stark example. This siege, which culminated in the capture of the Azovstal steel plant after a two-month standoff, stands as a testament to the intensity of the fighting under his leadership.
Furthermore, his command during the capture of Avdiivka is also highly noteworthy. Reports suggest that the Russian forces under his command suffered tens of thousands of casualties during the offensive, highlighting the high cost of his “meat grinder” tactics. These tactics, characterized by wave after wave of infantry assaults designed to overwhelm and exhaust the defenders, are seen as extremely costly in terms of human lives.
The reported appointment has been met with mixed reactions. While some see it as a sign of the Kremlin’s endorsement of these brutal, attritional tactics, others raise concerns about the human cost and the long-term implications for Russian military strategy. The sheer scale of casualties in battles under Mordvichev’s command raises questions about the sustainability of such an approach.
The timing of the appointment is also noteworthy. It occurred amidst peace talks in Istanbul, a stark contrast that underscores the complexity of the ongoing conflict. The fact that Putin himself didn’t participate in the high-level discussions adds another layer of intrigue to this already complex situation. This could be interpreted as a calculated move, or perhaps a sign of a lack of serious commitment to diplomatic solutions.
Mordvichev’s past statements only add fuel to the ongoing debate. His previously stated belief that the invasion of Ukraine is only the beginning and that the war “will not stop here” paints a concerning picture of his potential future actions. This view, coupled with his track record, suggests a potentially aggressive and uncompromising military approach going forward.
The appointment raises critical questions about Russia’s long-term military strategy and its willingness to endure heavy losses in pursuit of its objectives. The human cost of these “meat grinder” tactics is immense, both for Russia and Ukraine. The fact that this style of warfare has been successful enough to lead to promotion raises disturbing questions about the future of the conflict and the potential for even more brutal fighting.
The impact of this appointment extends beyond the immediate battlefield. It has implications for the demographic future of both Russia and Ukraine, considering the substantial losses incurred during the war. The sustainability of continued reliance on these costly tactics will likely influence the long-term strategic calculus for both sides. The staggering number of casualties raises questions about the long-term viability of Russia’s approach.
In conclusion, the reported appointment of Colonel General Andrei Mordvichev as the new chief of Russia’s ground forces is a significant development with far-reaching consequences. His reputation for utilizing the “meat grinder” tactic, coupled with his past statements and the timing of the announcement, leaves many concerned about the potential for a more brutal and protracted conflict. The appointment invites scrutiny regarding Russia’s military strategy, its willingness to endure heavy casualties, and the long-term implications for both combatants.