By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Rachel Morin’s five children have filed a lawsuit against their grandmother and aunt, alleging that they have withheld approximately $54,000 raised through a GoFundMe campaign and other donations intended to support the children after their mother’s murder. The suit, filed in Harford County Circuit Court, accuses the grandmother and aunt of fraud and unjust enrichment. This is a second attempt by the children’s legal representatives to recover the funds; a previous suit was dismissed in February. The lawsuit comes after Victor Martinez-Hernandez was recently convicted of Morin’s murder.
Read the original article here
Rachel Morin’s children are suing their grandmother, Patty Morin, over the proceeds from a GoFundMe campaign established after Rachel’s murder. The lawsuit centers around the alleged failure of Patty Morin to distribute the approximately $54,000 raised to her grandchildren. This situation has sparked significant online debate, with many expressing outrage over the perceived exploitation of a tragedy for personal gain.
The funds, originally intended for Rachel Morin’s funeral expenses and to support her five children, have apparently not been properly allocated. Many commenters point out the irony of a family member supposedly profiting from a situation intended to help those in need. The perceived lack of transparency surrounding the use of the money further fuels the anger and questions surrounding Patty Morin’s actions.
The amount each child would receive after taxes and legal fees is anticipated to be significantly less than the total sum. This detail emphasizes the perceived injustice, as the beneficiaries are Rachel’s children, who have already suffered a significant loss. The situation highlights the vulnerability of those who rely on public donations following a tragedy.
The timing of the GoFundMe campaign launch, just a day after Rachel Morin’s body was discovered, is another point of contention. Some suggest this implies a prioritization of financial gain over grieving, highlighting a perceived lack of sensitivity and a potential rush to exploit the situation for personal benefit. This rapid transition from grief to fundraising has intensified criticism.
The substantial sums involved are also a factor in the controversy. While $54,000 might appear considerable, the commenters note that significant funeral costs could easily deplete the funds, leaving little remaining for the children. The assumption is that any remaining money should go directly to the children, not to Patty Morin. Even with expenses covered, the lawsuit suggests Patty Morin has benefited beyond what’s accounted for and the children are seeking their fair share.
Further complicating the matter is Patty Morin’s involvement in political discourse surrounding the case. Her appearances on conservative news programs and at the White House, coupled with the perception that she’s using the tragedy for political gain, have heightened negative reactions. Commenters allege that this politicization of the situation has distracted from the actual grieving process and the needs of the children. The narrative around her political activities has cast further doubt on her intentions regarding the GoFundMe funds.
The ongoing legal battle underscores the significant risks associated with GoFundMe campaigns. Commenters warn of the potential for fraud and exploitation, emphasizing the importance of due diligence when considering donations. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of transparency and accountability in managing funds collected for charitable purposes, especially in cases of sensitive tragedies.
Many commenters share experiences with similar situations, where family members or individuals have abused the trust associated with fundraising efforts. These anecdotes lend support to the concerns raised about potential misuse of donated funds. This collective experience indicates that this situation might not be an isolated incident.
The children’s lawsuit is not just a financial dispute; it represents a broader concern about ethical conduct and the responsibility that comes with handling funds intended for vulnerable individuals. It also brings attention to the complex emotional aspects involved when grief is intertwined with political agendas and personal gain. The outcome of the lawsuit will significantly impact how such fundraising initiatives are viewed and managed in the future.