By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Penn State proposes closing seven Commonwealth campuses due to Pennsylvania’s projected population decline, particularly in rural areas, and resulting decreased enrollment. The 143-page report cites a shrinking pool of potential students and unsustainable financial situations at the affected campuses, some experiencing enrollment drops exceeding 40%. The university aims to shift from a geographically-based model to a mission-based approach, prioritizing educational quality, regional relevance, and financial stability. The closures, pending board approval, would not take effect before spring 2027, with current and prospective students offered options to complete their degrees.
Read the original article here
Penn State’s recent announcement of looming campus closures is undeniably a significant event, and the university’s attribution of this to a “declining” Pennsylvania paints a complex picture. The core issue, it seems, isn’t solely about financial mismanagement or even the high cost of tuition, although these are certainly contributing factors. The root cause appears to be a confluence of long-term demographic trends impacting Pennsylvania’s population, particularly in rural areas.
This demographic shift isn’t a new phenomenon; it’s been building for decades, exacerbated by factors like the decline of industries such as coal mining and the lingering effects of the 2008 recession. The resulting lower birth rates and reduced K-12 enrollment have created a smaller pool of potential college students. The COVID-19 pandemic only served to amplify these pre-existing problems, leading to what’s been termed a “demographic cliff.”
Pennsylvania’s population decline is unevenly distributed, with rural counties facing the most significant reductions. This has direct implications for Penn State’s smaller, regional campuses, which often rely heavily on local students. These campuses, situated in areas experiencing population loss, simply don’t have the student base to sustain operations. It’s not that students aren’t choosing college; rather, there are fewer students to choose from in these specific locations. The idea of closing underutilized campuses, even if painful, may be a necessary step for fiscal responsibility.
The situation is further complicated by the rising cost of higher education and the associated student debt. The escalating cost of tuition, coupled with stagnant or slow-growing salaries, makes college a less appealing option for many young people. This is further compounded by the significant investment many universities have made in non-essential amenities, leading to inflated costs and arguably, a reduced focus on the core educational mission. This creates a vicious cycle: higher tuition leads to lower enrollment, which necessitates further tuition increases to cover costs.
This isn’t solely a Penn State problem; many smaller colleges and regional campuses across the state are grappling with similar challenges. The oversaturation of the higher education market in Pennsylvania, coupled with the shift in population from rural areas to urban centers, has created a situation where some institutions are simply unsustainable in their current form. The decision to close campuses is a difficult one, but it reflects a broader trend impacting higher education nationwide. A smaller pool of college-aged students, coupled with high costs and growing student debt, is putting enormous pressure on many institutions.
Penn State’s decision also highlights the need for a broader discussion about the future of higher education in Pennsylvania and beyond. Addressing the underlying demographic shifts and the affordability of college are crucial to ensuring the long-term viability of universities across the state. This requires a multifaceted approach, addressing issues such as economic development in rural areas, supporting K-12 education, and finding ways to control the ever-increasing cost of tuition. The simple truth is that a significant shift in the demographics of Pennsylvania has created a situation where, for Penn State at least, difficult decisions need to be made. This is not simply a question of blaming a “declining” Pennsylvania; rather, it’s a complex interplay of demographic shifts, economic factors, and the evolving landscape of higher education itself.
The comments reveal a public largely divided between those understanding the demographic realities underpinning Penn State’s decisions and those criticizing the university’s handling of the situation. The financial difficulties faced by Penn State are real, even with substantial donor support; the university’s decision isn’t solely about resource mismanagement. The high cost of higher education is a contributing factor to the overall situation and is a significant barrier for many students. Addressing these complex factors requires a multi-pronged approach, encompassing demographic trends, fiscal planning within the university, and overall systemic changes to the cost and accessibility of higher education.