A new survey reveals that a majority of American Jewish voters (52%) view President Trump as antisemitic, despite his administration’s actions aimed at combating antisemitism. While significant concern exists regarding antisemitism on campuses and nationwide (77% and upwards, respectively), most respondents believe Trump’s policies, such as university funding cuts and deportations of pro-Palestinian activists, actually exacerbate the problem. Further, Jewish voter approval of Trump’s performance remains low (26%), extending to his foreign policy and handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Finally, attachment to Israel has decreased among Jewish voters since the October 2023 Hamas attack, and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s popularity is significantly low.
Read More
President Trump signed the Take It Down Act, criminalizing the nonconsensual online distribution of authentic and AI-generated intimate images and videos. The legislation mandates website removal of such content within 48 hours of victim requests and imposes penalties on violators, including restitution and imprisonment. Bipartisan support led to the bill’s unanimous Senate passage and overwhelming House approval. The Act addresses the growing problem of deepfakes and online harassment, particularly impacting women and young people. First Lady Melania Trump championed the legislation, emphasizing its importance in protecting individuals from online abuse.
Read More
President Trump has reportedly increased pressure on Israel to end its conflict with Hamas, threatening to withdraw support if the fighting continues. This pressure followed Israel’s mobilization of reservists and intensified Gaza bombings. While Israel initially halted humanitarian aid, it has since resumed limited deliveries, with the UN expressing concern over insufficient aid levels. Simultaneously, Israel announced a new, US-backed humanitarian aid mechanism to prevent famine in Gaza while maintaining its military operation.
Read More
Senator Schumer is reportedly introducing legislation to block a gift from Qatar to former President Trump, a move that has sparked a flurry of reactions ranging from cautious optimism to outright cynicism. The proposed legislation aims to prevent Trump from accepting what many consider a blatant violation of the Emoluments Clause, a provision in the US Constitution prohibiting federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign entities without Congressional approval.
This whole situation is riddled with irony, given the apparent existence of existing legal frameworks designed to address such instances. Many commentators point out the inherent contradiction of introducing new legislation when the Constitution seemingly already prohibits such actions.… Continue reading
A French Senate inquiry revealed that the Macron government concealed Nestle’s illegal treatment of mineral water, including Perrier, violating French and European regulations. The report details a deliberate strategy of concealment, spanning years of using banned treatments to avoid contamination, ultimately resulting in a €2 million fine for Nestle. The estimated fraud totals over €3 billion, representing a significant deception of consumers. The inquiry interviewed numerous individuals, including Nestle executives, highlighting a lack of transparency from both Nestle and the French government.
Read More
The $2.5 million settlement resolves the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Ashli Babbitt, overturning a prior DOJ determination that her civil rights were not violated. The settlement includes legal fees, with a portion allocated to the right-wing legal group Judicial Watch. This resolution comes amidst ongoing conservative efforts to minimize the January 6th Capitol attack and portray participants as victims. The actions of Lt. Michael Byrd, who shot Babbitt, were previously deemed justified by both a DOJ investigation and internal Capitol Police investigation.
Read More
Despite international condemnation and pressure to lift its blockade, Israel, under Prime Minister Netanyahu, declared its intention to fully control Gaza, launching a major offensive in Khan Younis. This follows a near three-month blockade that left Gaza on the brink of famine, prompting a limited resumption of aid—deemed wholly insufficient by international leaders—while the military warned of an “unprecedented attack.” Canada, Britain, and France issued a joint statement threatening further action, including sanctions, if Israel does not cease its offensive and fully restore aid access. Netanyahu, however, justified the actions as necessary for achieving “complete victory,” including the release of hostages and Hamas’s destruction.
Read More
Robert Reich argues that President Trump’s tariffs threaten America’s global economic dominance by undermining the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. This shift, evidenced by investors withdrawing from U.S. Treasury bills, could lead to significant wealth loss and diminished American influence. The tariffs disproportionately harm lower-income Americans, acting as a regressive tax that increases the cost of goods. Reich questions the administration’s rationale for policies that accelerate the erosion of this crucial American economic advantage.
Read More
Walmart faces a difficult balancing act. Pressure from rising import costs, largely due to tariffs, necessitates potential price increases. This decision is complicated by Walmart’s vast American customer base and potential political repercussions. The company’s heavy reliance on foreign suppliers, particularly China, leaves it vulnerable to supply chain disruptions and fluctuating demand. Therefore, careful consideration is required to navigate these challenges.
Read More
Judge Beryl Howell ruled the Trump administration’s takeover of the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) unlawful, declaring actions taken by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) null and void. The judge’s decision reinstated USIP President George Moose and prohibited further actions against the institute’s property. Howell cited the administration’s failure to consult Congress and its forceful takeover, involving law enforcement, as violations of the USIP’s unique structure as an independent think tank. The White House, however, disagreed with the ruling, asserting the president’s right to reduce government entities.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood