By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Oklahoma’s new social studies curriculum, spearheaded by State Superintendent Ryan Walters, includes a controversial section instructing high schoolers to identify “discrepancies” in the 2020 election results, focusing on aspects like ballot counting halts and mail-in voting security. This revision, part of a broader effort to promote a Trump-aligned ideology in schools, has prompted a lawsuit from parents and educators alleging biased and improperly reviewed content. The changes, which also include elements promoting American exceptionalism and incorporating biblical references, faced opposition from some Republicans but were ultimately enacted despite costing taxpayers $33 million. This curriculum overhaul is part of a larger push by Walters against what he terms “woke” ideologies.
Read the original article here
Oklahoma high schools are poised to incorporate 2020 election conspiracy theories into their curriculum, presenting them as factual information. This decision has sparked widespread outrage and concern, particularly given Oklahoma’s already low ranking in education nationwide. The move is seen by many as a blatant attempt to rewrite history and indoctrinate students with a politically biased narrative.
This action directly contradicts the principles of factual education and critical thinking. Teaching demonstrably false information as truth is not only irresponsible but also actively harms students’ ability to discern fact from fiction. This undermines the very foundation of education and critical analysis.
The potential for long-term damage is significant. Students educated under this system may find themselves ill-equipped to navigate a complex world requiring sound reasoning and the ability to critically evaluate information. They will be hampered in their ability to engage with societal issues effectively.
The timing of this decision is also troubling. It comes at a moment when misinformation and disinformation are already rampant, making it even more critical for educational institutions to uphold truth and accuracy. Instead of combatting the spread of falsehoods, Oklahoma’s decision appears to be actively contributing to it.
The argument that schools are “indoctrinating” students with a liberal agenda is frequently used to justify such actions. However, the teaching of demonstrably false information as fact is precisely the definition of indoctrination, only it is a right-wing indoctrination. This hypocrisy is glaring and deeply troubling.
The decision to include 2020 election conspiracy theories in the curriculum is especially worrying because these theories have already caused significant societal division and harm. Presenting these unfounded claims as fact only serves to legitimize them and further polarize the population. This is a dangerous precedent.
This controversial decision also raises concerns about academic integrity and the role of educators. Teachers may find themselves in the uncomfortable position of having to teach material they know to be false, potentially undermining their professional integrity and morale. Forcing teachers to present these conspiracy theories compromises their ethical obligation to present accurate information.
Beyond the immediate impact on students and educators, the long-term consequences for Oklahoma’s reputation are significant. The state’s already low educational rankings are likely to worsen further, potentially impacting economic development and attracting qualified professionals. The state’s reputation will suffer greatly on the national and international stage.
The situation highlights the need for parental involvement and community engagement. Parents have a responsibility to advocate for their children’s education and ensure they are receiving accurate information. If parents and concerned citizens remain silent, this dangerous precedent will not only continue, but it will potentially spread to other states and further poison our educational systems.
The lack of credible evidence supporting the 2020 election conspiracy theories makes this situation even more alarming. The widespread rejection of these theories by courts, election officials, and fact-checkers underscores the blatant disregard for truth demonstrated by this decision. A thorough investigation into who is profiting from the new curriculum is absolutely necessary.
The argument that introducing this content is merely presenting “alternative facts” is completely invalid. There is no valid alternative to factual information. Promoting such a notion is a dangerous perversion of the educational process, and potentially an insidious attempt to cultivate a population vulnerable to manipulation and control.
Many believe that colleges and universities should consider the implications of this action when reviewing applications from Oklahoma high school graduates. It raises concerns about the students’ ability to engage in critical thinking and to reliably differentiate between truth and misinformation. This is a serious consideration for higher education institutions.
Ultimately, this situation is a sad reflection on the state of education and political discourse in Oklahoma and potentially the nation as a whole. The teaching of false narratives as fact is a dangerous path, potentially leading to a generation less equipped to deal with the challenges of a complex and ever-evolving world. It’s a clear indication of the urgent need for educational reform and a renewed commitment to truth and critical thinking.