By John Q. Hosedrinker 
To address a severe labor shortage exacerbated by the war in Ukraine and declining birth rates, Russia has reportedly received approximately 15,000 North Korean workers. These workers, many entering on student visas, are primarily employed in Russia’s Far East, valued for their willingness to accept low wages and long hours. This influx violates UN Security Council resolutions prohibiting the use of North Korean migrant labor, highlighting the deepening economic ties between Russia and North Korea. The deployment further underscores the significant impact of the Ukraine conflict on Russia’s workforce.
Read the original article here
North Korea has reportedly sent nearly 15,000 workers to Russia to help fill a significant labor shortage. This shortage is largely attributed to Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, which has resulted in substantial military losses and a mass exodus of men fleeing conscription. The already low birth rate in Russia further exacerbates the problem, leaving the country desperately short of workers across numerous sectors.
This influx of North Korean laborers, while providing a temporary solution for Russia’s labor crisis, raises serious ethical concerns. The term “workers” might be a gross understatement; the reality likely paints a far grimmer picture. The workers might be effectively enslaved, subjected to harsh working conditions and extremely low wages. The suggestion that they are essentially underpaid soldiers fulfilling orders reinforces this grim view. It’s highly unlikely they are given any choice in the matter, and their families back in North Korea could be held hostage, ensuring their compliance.
The financial arrangement between Russia and North Korea is far from charitable. Russia is clearly paying for these workers, but the payment likely benefits the North Korean regime more than the workers themselves. This transfer of labor is a significant violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions prohibiting the use of overseas North Korean migrant labor. The implications of this are multifaceted, impacting not only the workers but also the international geopolitical landscape.
The workers are reportedly deployed to various locations across Russia, with a concentration in the Far East. However, the Russian government hopes to relocate more of them to major cities, including Moscow. The attraction for Russian employers is clear: these North Korean workers are willing to endure long hours, often 12-hour shifts, for extremely low pay without complaining about the working conditions. This is undoubtedly a crucial factor in Russia’s decision to utilize them.
The deployment of these workers is intrinsically linked to the ongoing war in Ukraine. In addition to the laborers, North Korea has also reportedly sent thousands of soldiers to support the Russian military effort, participating in key battles like the counteroffensive in Kursk Oblast. These actions highlight the deepening military and economic cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang, a partnership cemented by a mutual defense treaty signed in late 2022.
The long-term consequences of this arrangement are deeply troubling. For the North Korean workers, it represents an extended period of exploitation with little to no hope of improving their lives. Their only exposure to the outside world is within the brutal realities of the Russian war machine and the possibility of experiencing something as commonplace as pornography might be a jarring juxtaposition. They experience the war, the shortage, the harshness of the labor, but it is only one side of the equation.
For Russia, the reliance on such a workforce points to a deeper systemic issue – a dwindling population and a failing workforce unable to sustain its own needs. This is not a short-term problem; the continued reliance on foreign labor, particularly under such exploitative conditions, signifies a longer-term population implosion. The long-term implications are not positive. The current strategy is unlikely to resolve Russia’s labor issues; in fact, it could accelerate its decline.
In this scenario, North Korea, despite its own oppressive regime, appears to benefit financially from the arrangement. While the workers endure hardship, the North Korean government is likely receiving significant revenue, strengthening its already authoritarian grip on its population. This transactional relationship further underscores the complex and morally challenging aspects of the situation. The long-term effects on the Russian and North Korean populations remain to be seen, but the implications of this extensive labor transfer are undeniably far-reaching and deeply concerning.