By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll reveals that Georgia Governor Brian Kemp is the Republican candidate most likely to defeat incumbent Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff in the 2024 election. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also considering a Senate run, significantly trails Kemp and Ossoff in hypothetical matchups, garnering only 37% support compared to Ossoff’s 54%. Other potential Republican challengers, Raffensperger and King, also lag behind Ossoff in the poll results. This suggests that Greene faces an uphill battle in a potential Senate campaign.
Read the original article here
MTG is considering a run for the Senate, a move met with a range of reactions, from gleeful anticipation of her defeat to fearful speculation about her replacement. A recent poll places her firmly in last position among potential candidates, a stark illustration of her current standing.
This poor polling position doesn’t deter some, who see her Senate bid as a strategic opportunity. The hope is that a resounding defeat in the primary would simultaneously clear her out of the House of Representatives, eliminating her disruptive presence from national politics. Her current House seat is viewed by some as being secured only because of the political makeup of her district, described by some as populated by “ignorant morons.” This suggests the belief that her statewide appeal is significantly weaker than her local support.
However, others express concern about the potential consequences of her departure. If MTG loses her House seat, the question arises of who would replace her. The fear is that an equally or even more extreme candidate might emerge to fill the void, leaving the overall political landscape unchanged. This uncertainty fuels the debate about whether encouraging her Senate run is truly a net positive.
The prospect of MTG running against a strong opponent like Jon Ossoff adds another layer to the discussion. Some see this matchup as a guaranteed win for Ossoff, viewing MTG’s candidacy as an easy victory for the incumbent. This sentiment highlights the perceived wide chasm between their political platforms and appeal to different sections of the electorate. This potential contest, while seen by some as a sure win for Ossoff, is also seen by others as a chance for Ossoff’s seat to be at risk.
The prevailing sentiment among those who want her to run centers around a desire to remove her from office, regardless of the method. Whether it’s through a primary defeat in the Senate race or a challenge to her current House seat, the underlying goal remains the same – to eliminate her influence in national politics. This highlights the level of concern and even distaste surrounding her political actions and statements.
There’s a pervasive belief among many that MTG is wildly overestimating her political viability. Her popularity seems confined to a limited geographical area, leading some to suggest she is delusional in even considering a statewide race. The belief that she’s incredibly out of touch with the majority of voters is a common thread amongst those commenting.
Despite her unfavorable poll numbers, some remain wary of dismissing her chances altogether. There’s a lingering fear that substantial funding from powerful political figures could unexpectedly boost her campaign, even if she’s currently a long shot. The concern is that despite public opinion, she might still have the backing necessary to continue to be a presence in politics. The possibility of this, even as a remote likelihood, is deeply unsettling for many.
Yet, despite the serious political implications, some find humor in the situation. The idea of MTG running for the Senate and subsequently losing is seen by some as a meme-worthy event. This suggests that even amidst the political anxieties, there’s a degree of dark comedy involved in her ambition. The sheer irony of her potential downfall, given her outspoken nature, is a source of amusement for some. This lighter perspective exists alongside the more serious considerations of the potential political consequences.
Overall, MTG’s potential Senate run is a multifaceted issue. It presents an opportunity to remove her from power, yet simultaneously carries the risk of replacing her with an equally problematic candidate. The conflicting viewpoints highlight the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the current political climate. The situation also serves to underscore the deep divisions and passionate feelings held by different segments of the population regarding the current political environment.