By John Q. Hosedrinker 
High-profile figures drastically inflate the number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S., despite the actual figure being around 11 million. Studies show undocumented immigrants have lower crime rates than U.S.-born citizens and legal immigrants. The Trump administration’s attempts at mass deportations have fallen far short of stated goals, leading to frustration and pressure on ICE agents to increase arrests. This has resulted in the targeting of low-hanging fruit and the dissemination of misinformation about the criminality of deported individuals.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller’s ambitious deportation plans, envisioned as a swift and decisive removal of millions of undocumented immigrants, are demonstrably failing. This failure is causing him significant frustration and anger, a reaction readily apparent in his public demeanor and likely behind closed doors as well.
The sheer scale of his proposed undertaking is proving insurmountable. The logistics of identifying, apprehending, and deporting tens of millions of individuals who are effectively integrated into society are proving far more complex than initially anticipated. These individuals blend seamlessly into communities, work alongside legal citizens, and often possess strong support networks that shield them from detection and deportation.
The lack of readily available resources also significantly hinders Miller’s efforts. The resources necessary to effectively execute such a massive deportation campaign are simply not available. The sheer cost alone would be astronomical, straining existing budgets and possibly demanding cuts elsewhere, and the manpower requirements are similarly overwhelming. Moreover, any attempt to significantly expand ICE’s reach would likely face significant public backlash and legal challenges.
Beyond resource limitations, Miller’s initial assumptions about the composition of the undocumented population appear to have been grossly inaccurate. The idea that a majority are hardened criminals ripe for immediate deportation is proving baseless. The reality is that a significant proportion of undocumented immigrants are everyday people contributing to the economy, raising families, and engaging in otherwise legal activities. This makes the targeting of specific individuals for deportation a far more intricate process than originally conceived.
The attempted enforcement of Miller’s vision has also unintentionally resulted in the wrongful apprehension of numerous US citizens and legal residents. These mistakes, possibly deliberate in some cases, suggest the underlying plan lacks a carefully considered approach and robust oversight. This further undermines public support and exposes the inherent flaws in the strategy.
Even the supposed successes of Miller’s policies are demonstrably limited and unsustainable. While some deportations have taken place, the numbers pale in comparison to the vast scope of his intended goal. The pace of deportations is slow, and the sheer magnitude of the task suggests that true progress is negligible, leaving him continually short of his stated objectives.
Furthermore, the emotional toll of these failures is evidently weighing heavily on Miller. His frustration, bordering on rage, is widely visible and speaks volumes about the collapse of his far-reaching plans. This anger might be a sign of desperation, highlighting the crumbling facade of his grand vision of mass deportations and demonstrating his inability to accept the limitations of his flawed strategies.
The inability of Miller’s plan to achieve its intended outcome ultimately reflects a fundamental miscalculation of its feasibility. The inherent difficulty in identifying and deporting such a large and dispersed population combined with the practical and financial constraints, highlight the significant flaws in his approach from the outset. His anger is, perhaps, a testament to the recognition of his own failings rather than any legitimate grievance concerning the supposed lack of effort on the part of those tasked with implementing his plans.
The fact that Miller’s “deportation machine” is sputtering and grinding to a halt is, for many, a cause for celebration. It represents a failure of a policy widely considered to be cruel, inhumane, and ultimately unrealistic. The inherent flaws in the plan, coupled with a demonstrably inaccurate understanding of the population it sought to target, render Miller’s rage a rather predictable outcome, and one that few will sympathize with. The inability to implement his extreme vision might be seen as a victory for those who oppose his approach.