By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A leaked Canadian military report reveals high attrition rates, particularly among new recruits, due to extensive training delays averaging over 206 days for specialized trades. This is attributed to insufficient trainers, equipment, and facilities, leading to frustration and underemployment. The report also highlights the defunding of a key retention program office, hindering efforts to address the issue, despite acknowledged problems with training and retention by top military commanders. While some initiatives show promise, the overall situation demonstrates a significant challenge in retaining personnel, particularly those in critical technical roles.
Read the original article here
A leaked Canadian military report reveals a concerning trend: many new recruits are leaving the forces shortly after joining. This isn’t entirely unexpected, considering efforts to expedite the recruitment process by streamlining security clearances and speeding up the release of unsuitable candidates. The logical outcome of this approach is a higher rate of early departures.
The problem isn’t solely about unsuitable recruits; it’s also about a significant mismatch between recruitment numbers and training capacity. The resulting lengthy delays in accessing training create frustration and discouragement among new recruits, leading many to seek opportunities elsewhere. Initiatives like the Non-Commissioned Officer Education Plan (NEP) are a step in the right direction, as they allow recruits to explore various trades and stagger training based on capacity. However, this alone doesn’t address the core issues.
One major factor contributing to the high attrition rate is the significant pay disparity between military roles and comparable civilian positions. Some military jobs offer salaries as low as $50,000 annually, while similar civilian roles can command nearly double that. This discrepancy is especially discouraging for skilled individuals who could earn significantly more in the private sector. The current system doesn’t incentivize many qualified individuals to join, particularly given the demanding lifestyle involving relocation and often substandard living conditions.
The very purpose of military service in Canada needs reevaluation. The current model of “elite professional soldiers sent abroad to do good” needs to shift towards a focus on serving as an “emergency operations arm of the federal government”. This change in perspective would facilitate implementing necessary adjustments like expanding reserve and part-time options, addressing the inadequate compensation, and fostering stronger community ties for service members. The current “social contract” is broken, much like the unrealistic expectation of a clear path from university to a stable job and homeownership.
The argument that military pay is comparatively better than in other countries doesn’t fully address the Canadian context. The current economic climate, bordering on recession for many young people, exacerbates the issue. For young Canadians struggling to find even entry-level jobs, the military might seem like a relatively secure option, even with lower starting pay and benefits. However, this isn’t a sustainable solution, and it doesn’t address the underlying problems that push recruits to leave.
The military’s inadequate infrastructure and equipment also contribute significantly to the high attrition rate. Recruits face long waiting periods in dilapidated accommodation and training facilities, further impacting morale. The lack of modern equipment and platforms creates an unprofessional training environment that fails to attract and retain skilled personnel. The issues extend beyond the initial recruit level, affecting even experienced non-commissioned and commissioned officers who are essential for training and operations.
Anecdotal evidence suggests a pervasive problem with outdated training methods, malfunctioning equipment, and leadership lacking relevant field experience. These experiences contribute to the disillusionment and early departure of recruits. The stories from the past few years have varied, however, the consistency between multiple perspectives indicates an underlying cultural problem within the ranks that needs immediate attention.
The recruitment process itself contributes to the problem. The long wait times to even get accepted, sometimes two years or more, allow recruits to build careers and lives outside the military. By the time they are accepted, their reasons for joining may have diminished. The lack of consistent communication throughout the process adds to the frustration.
The perception of the military environment as overly harsh and inflexible is also a major factor. The idea that recruits “must be treated like shit to be tough” is an outdated and counterproductive approach that fails to attract talent. The lack of clear career paths and the difficulty of finding roles that align with individual skills and interests also negatively affect retention. A shift towards a more supportive and balanced approach is essential to retain recruits. The constant comparison with American military experiences, while valuable, is not always an apples-to-apples comparison. Different structures, different missions, and different budgets lead to different outcomes. However, the common theme is the need for improved training infrastructure, fair compensation, and a more sustainable approach to recruiting and retaining personnel.
Ultimately, addressing the high attrition rate requires comprehensive action across the board. Simply increasing recruitment efforts without addressing the underlying issues of pay, training, infrastructure, and overall organizational culture is a futile effort. Addressing these fundamental problems is critical to building a robust and effective Canadian military. The government needs to invest in modernizing facilities, improving equipment, and increasing compensation for all roles. The culture also needs improvement and needs to move away from outdated and counterproductive methods and adopt a more balanced and supportive approach. Only then can the Canadian military attract and retain the skilled personnel needed to fulfill its mandate.