By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new Russian history book, prefaced by Sergey Lavrov, is condemned by Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys as a tool of hostile propaganda. The book, freely available online, denies the existence of the Lithuanian nation and language, attributing its creation to Slavs and Russia. This echoes Russia’s previous attempts to delegitimize neighboring countries, notably Putin’s essay on Ukraine’s non-existence. The book’s authors include a former associate of a Lithuanian politician convicted of spying for Russia, highlighting the coordinated nature of this disinformation campaign. Lithuania must counter this propaganda by effectively promoting its own historical narrative.
Read the original article here
Russia’s recent publication of a book on Lithuanian history, with a preface penned by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, has predictably ignited a firestorm of criticism. The very act of Russia releasing such a publication, especially with Lavrov’s involvement, is viewed as a blatant attempt to rewrite history and justify potential future aggression.
The book’s content is widely expected to present a drastically skewed and inaccurate portrayal of Lithuanian history, minimizing or completely ignoring Lithuania’s long and independent existence. The historical record, however, unequivocally contradicts any suggestion of Lithuania’s non-existence or its subordinate status to Russia. Lithuania’s rich history, dating back centuries, is well-documented, including its establishment as a Grand Duchy and its participation in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. These facts are irrefutable and easily verifiable.
Lavrov’s association with the project further fuels suspicions of the book’s malicious intent. His well-known history of making inflammatory statements and distorting facts casts a long shadow over the book’s credibility. The sheer presence of his name on the preface serves as a clear indicator that this is not a scholarly work but a piece of political propaganda.
The Lithuanian response to this publication has been one of fierce defiance and indignant rejection. Lithuanians view the book as a blatant attempt at historical revisionism, aimed at undermining their national identity and sovereignty. They point to the sheer audacity of Russia attempting to claim ownership of a nation with such a distinct and documented history. The strength of this feeling is undeniable, and it’s easy to see why this would be considered a deeply offensive act.
The timing of this publication is also telling, coinciding with increased tensions in the region and Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine. Many see this as a clear indication of Russia’s intentions to potentially extend its aggression further into the Baltic region. The publication appears not as a historical endeavor, but as a tool for psychological warfare, designed to sow seeds of doubt and division among Lithuanians and to prepare the international community for potential future actions.
The widespread dismissal of the book’s credibility highlights its fundamental flaws. The claims made within are viewed as blatant falsehoods and fabrications. The assertion that Lithuanian language and identity are somehow insignificant is ludicrous, as is the downplaying of Lithuania’s long history of statehood. These false narratives are easily refuted by widely available historical sources.
The fact that the book is not being considered a serious historical analysis is self-evident. It is instead being interpreted as an overt act of political aggression, a provocative move meant to test the resolve of the international community and potentially lay the groundwork for further destabilizing actions in the region.
The outrage expressed online showcases the deep-seated anger and resentment felt by many towards Russia’s continued attempts to manipulate historical narratives. The comments clearly reflect a determined resistance to Russia’s attempts to rewrite history and dictate the future of the Baltic states.
The ongoing war in Ukraine undeniably adds a critical context to this situation. The fear is that Russia, having failed to achieve its objectives in Ukraine, might now shift its focus towards other neighboring countries it views as vulnerable. Lithuania, given its proximity and history, is seen as a prime target for such ambitions.
The international community’s response to this book will be crucial. Failure to firmly condemn this blatant attempt at historical distortion would send a dangerous signal, emboldening Russia to continue its aggressive actions. A strong and united response is necessary to reaffirm the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lithuania and other countries facing similar threats. The question is not just about a book; it’s about upholding the principles of international law and protecting smaller nations from aggressive revisionist powers.