By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Bush administration official, alleges the U.S. government secretly built a $21 trillion underground bunker network between 1998 and 2015, citing a 2017 report detailing massive unauthorized spending. Fitts claims this network comprises approximately 170 bases, some underwater, intended to shelter elites and house secret projects. Her assertions are based on financial discrepancies and analysis, though lacking direct physical evidence. The scale of the alleged project dwarfs known Cold War-era bunkers, raising significant questions about the whereabouts of the purported missing funds.
Read the original article here
The claim that the US government secretly spent $21 trillion on underground doomsday bunkers for the elite is a staggering assertion. Such an enormous expenditure, nearly half the annual US GDP, would be virtually impossible to conceal. The sheer scale of construction—requiring hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of workers—guarantees a substantial paper trail that would be incredibly difficult to suppress. The involvement of numerous major contractors and subcontractors, not to mention the logistical complexities of supplying such massive projects, makes a complete lack of public awareness almost inconceivable.
The sheer volume of materials alone would leave an undeniable mark. The claim’s scale dwarfs even the most ambitious construction projects in history. While some might posit the existence of secret, advanced technology to expedite the process, it still wouldn’t negate the enormous logistical implications. The idea that thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of individuals could keep such a project entirely secret is highly improbable.
The claim also lacks credibility given the known issues with the Department of Defense’s budgeting and accounting practices. The department has consistently failed audits, indicating a significant lack of transparency and control already in place. Adding a $21 trillion project to that existing lack of accountability makes the entire narrative far less plausible.
The source of this claim, a former official known for promoting conspiracy theories, further undermines its credibility. Her association with outlets and personalities known for spreading misinformation casts serious doubt on the reliability of her statements. The timing of these revelations, alongside the release of fictional works exploring similar themes, raises further questions about potential motivations behind the dissemination of this information.
The argument presented also plays into pre-existing conspiracy theories, notably the New World Order narrative. This association weakens the credibility of the claim by linking it to established, often unfounded, beliefs. The lack of concrete evidence – no whistleblowers, no leaked documents, no significant geological anomalies – makes it extremely difficult to accept the claim at face value.
Even the suggested existence of an extensive underground transportation network connecting these bunkers adds another layer of implausibility. Such a project would necessitate an unprecedented level of coordination and secrecy, involving not only construction workers but also engineers, geologists, and numerous other specialists. The energy requirements for such a network are also substantial, further compounding the impossibility of complete secrecy.
Furthermore, the functional practicality of such bunkers is questionable. Maintaining a self-sufficient underground city for an extended period would require vast resources, including sustainable food production, waste management, and advanced life support systems. The logistical challenges of providing for even a small population in a long-term underground setting are immense. The claim that the elite would be equipped to address the myriad of problems associated with a catastrophic event is largely unfounded.
In conclusion, while the allure of a clandestine doomsday preparation program for the elite is captivating, the sheer magnitude of the claim, the lack of verifiable evidence, and the questionable source make it highly improbable. The economic impossibility, logistical challenges, and the absence of any credible supporting data lead to the conclusion that this claim is far-fetched, bordering on fantastical. The $21 trillion figure alone should raise immediate red flags regarding the veracity of this particular narrative.